These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2703100)

  • 1. True rupture of the caesarean section scar (a 15 year review, 1972-1987).
    Meehan FP; Magani IM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1989 Feb; 30(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 2703100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. True rupture/scar dehiscence in delivery following prior section.
    Meehan FP; Burke G; Kehoe JT; Magani IM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1990 Mar; 31(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 1969366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trial of scar with induction/oxytocin in delivery following prior section.
    Meehan FP
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1988; 15(4):117-23. PubMed ID: 3233752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Obstetrical prognosis of patients after a previous caesarean section performed before 32 weeks of amenorrhea].
    Baeza C; Mottet N; Coppola C; Desmarets M; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Nov; 44(11):629-635. PubMed ID: 27765430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Delivery after caesarean section: review of 2176 consecutive cases.
    Molloy BG; Sheil O; Duignan NM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Jun; 294(6588):1645-7. PubMed ID: 3113567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Update on delivery following prior cesarean section: a 15-year review 1972-1987.
    Meehan FP; Burke G; Kehoe JT
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Nov; 30(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 2575044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.
    Guise JM; McDonagh MS; Osterweil P; Nygren P; Chan BK; Helfand M
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7456):19-25. PubMed ID: 15231616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labour after caesarean section.
    Gobillot S; Ghenassia A; Coston AL; Gillois P; Equy V; Michy T; Hoffmann P
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec; 47(10):539-543. PubMed ID: 30253940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
    Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine rupture and labour after a previous low transverse caesarean section.
    Turner MJ; Agnew G; Langan H
    BJOG; 2006 Jun; 113(6):729-32. PubMed ID: 16709218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Caesarean section and trial of scar.
    Targett C
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Nov; 28(4):249-62. PubMed ID: 3074775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?
    Kiran TS; Chui YK; Bethel J; Bhal PS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 16221523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section.
    Locatelli A; Regalia AL; Ghidini A; Ciriello E; Biffi A; Pezzullo JC
    BJOG; 2004 Dec; 111(12):1394-9. PubMed ID: 15663125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trial of labour after two or three previous caesarean sections.
    Spaans WA; van der Vliet LM; Röell-Schorer EA; Bleker OP; van Roosmalen J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2003 Sep; 110(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12932864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Women with previous caesarean or other uterine scar: epidemiological features].
    Deneux-Tharaux C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Dec; 41(8):697-707. PubMed ID: 23123080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placenta praevia and accreta: analysis of a two-year experience.
    Zaideh SM; Abu-Heija AT; El-Jallad MF
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1998 Aug; 46(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 9701688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trial of scar and vaginal birth after caesarean section.
    Hassan A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2005; 17(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 15929530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trial of labor in previous cesarean section patients, excluding classical cesarean sections.
    Stovall TG; Shaver DC; Solomon SK; Anderson GD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):713-7. PubMed ID: 3658277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Maternal benefits and risks of trial of labor versus elective repeat caesarean delivery in women with a previous caesarean delivery].
    Beucher G; Dolley P; Lévy-Thissier S; Florian A; Dreyfus M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Dec; 41(8):708-26. PubMed ID: 23159201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: obstetric outcome.
    Chua S; Arulkumaran S; Singh P; Ratnam SS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Feb; 29(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2562593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.