These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2703105)
1. EPA, environmental release, and the regulatory process. Farnham P FASEB J; 1989 Apr; 3(6):1687-8. PubMed ID: 2703105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Unauthorized release upsets EPA. Ezzell C Nature; 1987 Aug 20-26; 328(6132):659. PubMed ID: 3475580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Recombinant DNA. Prospect of new US regulation: surprise welcome for EPA. Budiansky S Nature; 1984 Aug 23-29; 310(5979):613. PubMed ID: 6590966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic manipulation: agency tries out regulations. Beardsley T Nature; 1984 Oct 25-31; 311(5988):695. PubMed ID: 6593598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biotechnology revolution and its regulatory evolution. Hoffman DE Drake Law Rev; 1988-1989; 38(3):471-550. PubMed ID: 16086466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Agricultural biotechnology: occupational health and regulatory issues. Glass DJ Occup Med; 1991; 6(2):301-10. PubMed ID: 2047979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal and regulatory considerations in environmental biotechnology applications. McGarity TO Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Mar; 8(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 3858922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. EPA suspends biotech permit. Sun M Science; 1986 Apr; 232(4746):15. PubMed ID: 3456642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nuclear waste. EPA regulates at last. Beardsley T Nature; 1985 Aug 29-Sep 4; 316(6031):757. PubMed ID: 4033774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Summary of in-house EPA workshop to define research/technical support approaches in biotechnology. Fowle JR Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1984 Jun; 7(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 6473824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testimony of Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight, the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research and Environment, and the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology, July 23, 1986. Moore JA Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 3786829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of environmental risk assessment studies sponsored by EPA. Levin M Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1982 Dec; 5(4):177-80. PubMed ID: 6962468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Biotech companies lobby for Federal regulation. Crawford M Science; 1990 May; 248(4955):546-7. PubMed ID: 2333503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The need for risk assessment legislation. Ritter D Risk Anal; 1988 Jun; 8(2):169-70. PubMed ID: 3413308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Statement of Assistent Director, Biological, Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Science Foundation before the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, July 23, 1986. Kingsbury DT Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1986 Sep; 9(3):139-50. PubMed ID: 3786828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Congressional hearing on the adequacy of current statutes and scientific knowledge for the regulation of biotechnology. Milewski E Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Mar; 8(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 3858924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science and politics: the possible regulation of cancer promoters. Williams JR; Clark WL Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Apr; 50():351-4. PubMed ID: 6873026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Larger public sector role sought on biotech. Crawford M Science; 1986 Apr; 232(4746):15-6. PubMed ID: 3456643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]