These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27031499)

  • 1. Comparison of W-Plasty vs Traditional Straight-Line Techniques for Primary Paramedian Forehead Flap Donor Site Closure.
    Jáuregui EJ; Tummala N; Seth R; Arron S; Neuhaus I; Yu S; Grekin R; Knott PD
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016 Jul; 18(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 27031499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of W-Plasty and Straight-Line Trichophytic Closure on Aesthetic Outcomes of Occipital Hairline Scars in Rhytidectomy.
    Roy S; Buckingham ED
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 20(1):14-18. PubMed ID: 28837737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Cosmetic Outcomes of Straight-Line Versus W-Plasty Techniques for Linear Postauricular Wound Closure: A Randomized Evaluator Blind Split-Scar Trial.
    Mehrzad M; Kang AS; Armstrong AW; Eisen DB
    Dermatol Surg; 2024 May; 50(5):423-427. PubMed ID: 38416811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viability and Cosmesis of Right Angle and Vertical Paramedian Forehead Flaps Are Equivalent: A Retrospective Quantitative Study.
    Mukovozov IM; Laroche A; Wong A; Zloty D
    Dermatol Surg; 2022 Jul; 48(7):716-719. PubMed ID: 35576435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The midline central artery forehead flap: a valid alternative to supratrochlear-based forehead flaps.
    Faris C; van der Eerden P; Vuyk H
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 25322444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paramedian forehead flap.
    Smart RJ; Yeoh MS; Kim DD
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2014 Aug; 26(3):401-10. PubMed ID: 24973992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes of 2-Stage Versus 3-Stage Paramedian Forehead Flap Techniques: A 9-Year Comparative Study With Prospectively Collected Data.
    Stahl AS; Gubisch W; Haack S; Meisner C; Stahl S
    Dermatol Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1137-48. PubMed ID: 26359997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of paramedian forehead and nasolabial interpolation flaps in nasal reconstruction.
    Paddack AC; Frank RW; Spencer HJ; Key JM; Vural E
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 138(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 22431859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Lateral Forehead Rotational Flaps to Close Paramedian Forehead Flap Donor Sites.
    Butz DR; Warner J
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2016; 18(2):146-8. PubMed ID: 26796954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Cohort Study of Paramedian Forehead Flap in 2 Stages (87 Flaps) and 3 Stages (100 Flaps).
    Santos Stahl A; Gubisch W; Fischer H; Haack S; Meisner C; Stahl S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 75(6):615-9. PubMed ID: 25003405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography for early division of the forehead flap pedicle.
    Surowitz JB; Most SP
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 25880793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Donor Site Aesthetic Enhancement With Preoperative Botulinum Toxin in Forehead Flap Nasal Reconstruction.
    Zelken J; Yang SY; Chang CS; Chang CJ; Yang JY; Chuang SS; Chen HC; Hsiao YC
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Nov; 77(5):535-538. PubMed ID: 26418784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expanded Paramedian Forehead Flaps for Nasal Defects: Beyond Aesthetic Subunits.
    Ni HC; Wang JC; Sun JM; Guo NQ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Dec; 81(6S Suppl 1):S54-S58. PubMed ID: 29553975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forehead Flap Practices: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons.
    DeSisto NG; Arnaud EH; Chowdhury N; Davis SJ; Kimura KS; Stephan SJ; Patel PN; Yang SF
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2024; 26(3):256-261. PubMed ID: 38150510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin Grafts vs Local Flaps for Reconstruction of Nasal Defects: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Sapthavee A; Munaretto N; Toriumi DM
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 26021837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of Bridge Flaps for Primary Closure of Donor Sites of Interpolated Forehead Flaps.
    Chun Wong JL; Salmon PJ
    Dermatol Surg; 2021 Jan; 47(1):145-146. PubMed ID: 31714377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-opposing rotation-advancement flaps for closure of forehead defects.
    Ransom ER; Jacono AA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 22986941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radial forearm free flap donor site morbidity: ulnar-based transposition flap vs split-thickness skin graft.
    Jaquet Y; Enepekides DJ; Torgerson C; Higgins KM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jan; 138(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22249627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary W-Plasty Closure for Surgical Repair of the Injured Lip.
    Gómez A; Pomares A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e57-8. PubMed ID: 26703072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Elegant solutions for complex paramedian forehead flap reconstruction.
    Schreiber NT; Mobley SR
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2011 Aug; 19(3):465-79. PubMed ID: 21856535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.