These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27032640)

  • 1. The ability of external immobilizers to restrict movement of the cervical spine: a systematic review.
    Holla M; Huisman JM; Verdonschot N; Goosen J; Hosman AJ; Hannink G
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2023-36. PubMed ID: 27032640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Restriction of Cervical Intervertebral Movement With Different Types of External Immobilizers: A Cadaveric 3D Analysis Study.
    Holla M; Hannink G; Eggen TGE; Daanen RA; Hosman AJF; Verdonschot N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1182-E1189. PubMed ID: 28230622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
    Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of prehospital cervical immobilization devices using video and electromyography.
    Manix T; Gunderson MR; Garth GC
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 1995; 10(4):232-7; discussion 237-8. PubMed ID: 10155435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical immobilization in trauma patients: soft collars better than rigid collars? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bäcker HC; Elias P; Braun KF; Johnson MA; Turner P; Cunningham J
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Dec; 31(12):3378-3391. PubMed ID: 36181555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the thermoplastic Minerva body jacket on cervical spine motion.
    Maiman D; Millington P; Novak S; Kerk J; Ellingsen J; Wenninger W
    Neurosurgery; 1989 Sep; 25(3):363-7; discussion 367-8. PubMed ID: 2771007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects of Cervical Orthoses on Head and Intervertebral Range of Motion.
    Oyekan AA; LeVasseur CM; Chen SR; Padmanabhan A; Makowicz N; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Shaw JD; Anderst WJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Nov; 48(22):1561-1567. PubMed ID: 37339257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improvised vs Standard Cervical Collar to Restrict Spine Movement in the Backcountry Environment.
    Porter A; Difrancesca M; Slack S; Hudecek L; McIntosh SE
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Dec; 30(4):412-416. PubMed ID: 31706730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The stabilizing effects of different orthoses in the intact and unstable upper cervical spine: a cadaver study.
    Richter D; Latta LL; Milne EL; Varkarakis GM; Biedermann L; Ekkernkamp A; Ostermann PA
    J Trauma; 2001 May; 50(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 11371840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of 2 different thoracolumbar orthoses on the stability of the spine during various body movements.
    Kienle A; Saidi S; Oberst M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1082-9. PubMed ID: 23644685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cineradiography of the braced normal cervical spine. A comparative study of five commonly used cervical orthoses.
    Hartman JT; Palumbo F; Hill BJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (109):97-102. PubMed ID: 1132211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion in the unstable cervical spine during hospital bed transfers.
    Conrad BP; Rechtine G; Weight M; Clarke J; Horodyski M
    J Trauma; 2010 Aug; 69(2):432-6. PubMed ID: 20699754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars.
    Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3-Dimensional Cervical Movement Characteristics and the Influence of Thoracic Treatment on a Subgroup of Acute Neck Pain Patients.
    Krott NL; Bloyinski GM; Cattrysse E
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2018 May; 41(4):304-314. PubMed ID: 29669689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of a SAM splint-molded cervical collar with a Philadelphia cervical collar.
    McGrath T; Murphy C
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2009; 20(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 19594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Minerva cervicothoracic orthosis.
    Sharpe KP; Rao S; Ziogas A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1475-9. PubMed ID: 8623066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.