These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27032738)

  • 1. Increasing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Canadian Academic Health Centre Experience.
    Gale J; Cameron C; Chen I; Guo Y; Singh SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 27032738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The trend towards minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometrial cancer: an ACS-NSQIP evaluation of surgical outcomes.
    Scalici J; Laughlin BB; Finan MA; Wang B; Rocconi RP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Mar; 136(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 25462206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
    Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
    Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rates over time and regional variation of radical minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: A population based study.
    Willows K; Kupets R; Diong C; Vicus D; Covens A; Gien LT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):338-344. PubMed ID: 31171407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social and Geographic Determinants of Hysterectomy in Ontario: A Population-Based Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis.
    Chen I; Wise MR; Dunn S; Anderson G; Degani N; Lefebvre G; Bierman AS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Oct; 39(10):861-869. PubMed ID: 28647446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures.
    Roumm AR; Pizzi L; Goldfarb NI; Cohn H
    Surg Innov; 2005 Sep; 12(3):261-87. PubMed ID: 16224649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of postoperative partial bladder filling after minimally invasive hysterectomy on postanesthesia care unit discharge and cost: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
    Moawad G; Tyan P; Marfori C; Abi Khalil E; Park D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):367.e1-367.e7. PubMed ID: 30639089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.
    Billfeldt NK; Borgfeldt C; Lindkvist H; Stjerndahl JH; Ankardal M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():113-118. PubMed ID: 29408741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions.
    Barber EL; Neubauer NL; Gossett DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):609.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25511239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does laparoscopy safely improve technicity for complex hysterectomy cases?
    Grant-Orser A; El Sugy R; Singh SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Mar; 36(3):248-252. PubMed ID: 24612894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice.
    Glasgow RE; Adamson KA; Mulvihill SJ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2004 Nov; 8(7):869-73; discussion 873-5. PubMed ID: 15531241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the Technicity Index to 92% in a Community Hospital: A 5-Year Retrospective Review.
    Mui J; Gottenbos L; Liu C; Hejazi S; Mohtashami F
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Dec; 41(12):1709-1716. PubMed ID: 30948338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.
    Hoffman CP; Kennedy J; Borschel L; Burchette R; Kidd A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 15904592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.
    Andryjowicz E; Wray TB; Reinaldo Ruiz V; Rudolf J; Noroozkhani S; Crowder S; Slezak JM
    Perm J; 2015; 19(4):39-45. PubMed ID: 26222092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Techniques for Nonmalignant Conditions in a Defined Population.
    Hansdottir K; Gudmundsson JA
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 28848157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Hysterectomies in patients with no history of vaginal delivery. A study of 243 cases].
    Dhainaut C; Salomon LJ; Junger M; Marcollet A; Madelenat P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005; 33(1-2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15752660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.