These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27032738)
41. Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Evidence from 143 Illinois Hospitals, 2016 to 2018. Traylor J; Simon M; Tsai S; Feinglass J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 32126301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. Payne TN; Dauterive FR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer. Polan RM; Tanner EJ; Barber EL J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 31655129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Hysterectomy in Ontario: A Population-Based Study of Outcomes and Complications in Minimally Invasive Compared with Abdominal Approaches. Kelly EC; Winick-Ng J; McClure JA; Peart T; Chou Q; MacMillan B; Leong Y; Vilos A; Vilos G; Welk B; McGee J J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Aug; 41(8):1168-1176. PubMed ID: 30686606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Risk Factors for Unscheduled 30-day Readmission after Benign Hysterectomy. Catanzarite T; Vieira B; Qin C; Milad MP South Med J; 2015 Sep; 108(9):524-30. PubMed ID: 26332476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Increased postoperative day one discharges after implementation of a hysterectomy enhanced recovery pathway: a retrospective cohort study. Miller EC; McIsaac DI; Chaput A; Antrobus J; Shenassa H; Lui A Can J Anaesth; 2015 May; 62(5):451-60. PubMed ID: 25724789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. Uddin OM; Haque R; Sugrue PA; Ahmed YM; El Ahmadieh TY; Press JM; Koski T; Fessler RG J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):798-806. PubMed ID: 26315955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients. Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications. Orady M; Aslanova R; Fidela Paraiso M Minerva Ginecol; 2014 Feb; 66(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 24569401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery. Fylstra DL; Carter JF J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications. Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Cohen SL; Wright KN; Shah NT; Chavan N; Einarsson JI Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 117(5):1142-1149. PubMed ID: 21508754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Minimally invasive surgery and its impact on 30-day postoperative complications, unplanned readmissions and mortality. Sood A; Meyer CP; Abdollah F; Sammon JD; Sun M; Lipsitz SR; Hollis M; Weissman JS; Menon M; Trinh QD Br J Surg; 2017 Sep; 104(10):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 28632890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Stepwise approach to laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluation of technique and cost benefit. Shepherd JA; Hudgens JL; Yussman MA; Biscette SM; Pasic R Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():166-75. PubMed ID: 24081842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures. Becker ER J Health Care Finance; 2007; 33(3):1-16. PubMed ID: 19175228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g. Cho HY; Park ST; Kim HB; Kang SW; Park SH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 23932973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy at a health maintenance organization. Cost-effectiveness and comparison with total abdominal hysterectomy. Bornstein SJ; Shaber RE J Reprod Med; 1995 Jun; 40(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 7650655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy more expensive than open despite shorter length of stay. Dhamija A; Dhamija A; Hancock J; McCloskey B; Kim AW; Detterbeck FC; Boffa DJ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 May; 45(5):904-9. PubMed ID: 24092502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Risk of mesh extrusion and other mesh-related complications after laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with or without concurrent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: experience of 402 patients. Stepanian AA; Miklos JR; Moore RD; Mattox TF J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 18312989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy is safe for patients and reduces institutional cost. Levy BS; Luciano DE; Emery LL J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2005; 12(6):494-501. PubMed ID: 16337576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]