These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27033086)

  • 1. Induced Loudness Reduction and Enhancement in Acoustic and Electric Hearing.
    Wang N; Kreft H; Oxenham AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 27033086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness Context Effects in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Wang N; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 16(4):535-45. PubMed ID: 26040213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vowel enhancement effects in cochlear-implant users.
    Wang N; Kreft H; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):EL421-6. PubMed ID: 22713016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better fitting of cochlear implants: modeling loudness for acoustic and electric stimuli.
    McDermott H; Varsavsky A
    J Neural Eng; 2009 Dec; 6(6):065007. PubMed ID: 19850972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The growth of loudness functions measured in cochlear implant listeners using absolute magnitude estimation and compared using Akaike's information criterion.
    Sanpetrino NM; Smith RL
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1642-4. PubMed ID: 17946915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural Representation of Loudness: Cortical Evoked Potentials in an Induced Loudness Reduction Experiment.
    Schmidt FH; Mauermann M; Kollmeier B
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216519900595. PubMed ID: 31994456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Tang Q; Liu S; Zeng FG
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 7(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 16425088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between test- and inducer-tone durations in induced loudness reduction.
    Nieder B; Buus S; Florentine M; Scharf B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Nov; 114(5):2846-55. PubMed ID: 14650019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Zhang C; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9373979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of loudness models to sound processing for cochlear implants.
    McDermott HJ; McKay CM; Richardson LM; Henshall KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2190-7. PubMed ID: 14587616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An introduction to induced loudness reduction.
    Epstein M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):EL74. PubMed ID: 17927311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comodulation masking release induced by controlled electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.
    Zirn S; Hempel JM; Schuster M; Hemmert W
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():60-6. PubMed ID: 23220120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loudness reduction induced by a contralateral tone.
    Nieder B; Buus S; Cazals Y; Scharf B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 17614461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of auditory nonlinearity for listeners with different hearing losses using temporal masking and categorical loudness scaling.
    Jürgens T; Kollmeier B; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):177-91. PubMed ID: 21669269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time course of loudness recalibration: implications for loudness enhancement.
    Arieh Y; Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1550-6. PubMed ID: 14514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; van Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 136(8):775-81. PubMed ID: 26986743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Verhey JL; Anweiler AK; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 16717019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.