410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27034079)
1. Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination.
Pata G; Bartoli M; Bianchi A; Pasini M; Roncali S; Ragni F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2802-8. PubMed ID: 27034079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of perioperative techniques to attain negative margins and spare healthy breast tissue in breast conserving surgery.
Krishna KL; Srinath BS; Santosh D; Velusamy S; Divyamala KP; Sariya Mohammadi J; Kurpad V; Kulkarni S; Yaji P; Goud S; Dhanireddy S; Ram J
Breast Dis; 2020; 39(3-4):127-135. PubMed ID: 32831188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic cavity shaving: modifications of breast cancer management and long-term local recurrence, a multicentre study.
Héquet D; Bricou A; Koual M; Ziol M; Feron JG; Rouzier R; Brouland JP; Delpech Y; Barranger E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 39(8):899-905. PubMed ID: 23773800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wang K; Ren Y; He J
PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0168705. PubMed ID: 28046058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of intra-operative margin management techniques in breast-conserving surgery: a standardised approach reduces the likelihood of residual disease without increasing operative time.
Bolger JC; Solon JG; Khan SA; Hill AD; Power CP
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 23649303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women with breast cancer.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; McCready DR; Escallon J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29525464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interest in cavity shaving in breast conservative treatment does not depend on lumpectomy technique.
Feron JG; Nguyen A; Bézu C; Antoine M; Darai E; Coutant C; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Breast; 2011 Aug; 20(4):358-64. PubMed ID: 21324697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive factors for residual disease in re-excision specimens after breast-conserving surgery.
Atalay C; Irkkan C
Breast J; 2012; 18(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22616572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Achieving clear margins. Directed shaving using MarginProbe, as compared to a full cavity shave approach.
Coble J; Reid V
Am J Surg; 2017 Apr; 213(4):627-630. PubMed ID: 28049561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins.
Gibson GR; Lesnikoski BA; Yoo J; Mott LA; Cady B; Barth RJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2001 Oct; 8(9):693-704. PubMed ID: 11597009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cavity shaving for invasive breast cancer conservative surgery: Reduced specimen volume and margin positive rates.
Mansilla-Polo M; Ruiz-Merino G; Marín-Rodríguez P; Iborra-Lacal E; Guzmán-Aroca F; M Servet Pérez de Lema C; Marín-Hernández C; Polo-García L; Piñero-Madrona A
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101632. PubMed ID: 34274752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients.
Obedian E; Haffty BG
Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 10696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
Iwai Y; Prigoff JG; Sun L; Wiechmann L; Taback B; Rao R; Ugras SK
J Surg Res; 2022 Sep; 277():296-302. PubMed ID: 35526391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Involved margins after lumpectomy for breast cancer: Always to be re-excised?
Sorrentino L; Agozzino M; Albasini S; Bossi D; Mazzucchelli S; Vanna R; Papadopoulou O; Villani L; Corsi F
Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():141-146. PubMed ID: 31500779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
Edwards BL; Guidry CA; Larson KN; Novicoff WM; Harvey JA; Schroen AT
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):782-8. PubMed ID: 26471488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of cavity shaving on reoperation rate following breast-conserving surgery.
Marudanayagam R; Singhal R; Tanchel B; O'Connor B; Balasubramanian B; Paterson I
Breast J; 2008; 14(6):570-3. PubMed ID: 19000040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does cavity margin shaving reduce residual tumor and re-excision rates? A systematic review.
Fernandez-Pacheco M; Ortmann O; Ignatov A; Inwald EC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 307(4):1295-1309. PubMed ID: 35593951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
