These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27034447)

  • 1. Natural Frequencies Do Not Foster Public Understanding of Medical Test Results.
    Pighin S; Gonzalez M; Savadori L; Girotto V
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Aug; 36(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 27034447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Natural Frequencies Do Foster Public Understanding of Medical Tests: Comment on Pighin, Gonzalez, Savadori, and Girotto (2016).
    McDowell M; Galesic M; Gigerenzer G
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):390-399. PubMed ID: 29448883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving public interpretation of probabilistic test results: distributive evaluations.
    Pighin S; Gonzalez M; Savadori L; Girotto V
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 24842952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural frequencies help older adults and people with low numeracy to evaluate medical screening tests.
    Galesic M; Gigerenzer G; Straubinger N
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 19129155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients.
    Garcia-Retamero R; Hoffrage U
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Apr; 83():27-33. PubMed ID: 23465201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of resident performance in interpreting mammography results using a probabilistic or a natural frequency presentation: a multi-institutional randomized experimental study.
    Msaouel P; Kappos T; Tasoulis A; Apostolopoulos AP; Lekkas I; Tripodaki ES; Keramaris NC
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26261111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of absolute risks, relative risks, frequencies, and probabilities on decision quality.
    Covey J
    J Health Commun; 2011 Aug; 16(7):788-801. PubMed ID: 21614719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fostering the Understanding of Positive Test Results.
    Pighin S; Tentori K; Savadori L; Girotto V
    Ann Behav Med; 2018 Oct; 52(11):909-919. PubMed ID: 30346498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What clinicians can offer: assessing and communicating probabilities for individual patient decision making.
    Timmermans DR
    Horm Res; 1999; 51 Suppl 1():58-66. PubMed ID: 10393493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials.
    Weinfurt KP; Depuy V; Castel LD; Sulmasy DP; Schulman KA; Meropol NJ
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 15534885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?
    Ling BS; Trauth JM; Fine MJ; Mor MK; Resnick A; Braddock CH; Bereknyei S; Weissfeld JL; Schoen RE; Ricci EM; Whittle J
    Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. PubMed ID: 18725829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experienced Probabilities Increase Understanding of Diagnostic Test Results in Younger and Older Adults.
    Armstrong B; Spaniol J
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Aug; 37(6):670-679. PubMed ID: 28199179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probabilities of benefit and harms of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: What do radiation oncologists tell and what do patients understand?
    Kunneman M; Stiggelbout AM; Marijnen CA; Pieterse AH
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Sep; 98(9):1092-8. PubMed ID: 26025810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity.
    Hamm RM; Smith SL
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 9673608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial.
    Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 21768582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluations of care by adults following a denial of an advertisement-related prescription drug request: the role of expectations, symptom severity, and physician communication style.
    Shah MB; Bentley JP; McCaffrey DJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Feb; 62(4):888-99. PubMed ID: 16137813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [About the risk to communicate risk].
    Wegwarth O; Gigerenzer G
    Ther Umsch; 2007 Dec; 64(12):687-92. PubMed ID: 18581918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visualizing the Bayesian 2-test case: The effect of tree diagrams on medical decision making.
    Binder K; Krauss S; Bruckmaier G; Marienhagen J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0195029. PubMed ID: 29584770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [How can one improve the understanding and communication of the importance of medical test results?].
    Hoffrage U; Kurzenhäuser S; Gigerenzer G
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2000 Oct; 94(9):713-9. PubMed ID: 11127778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient participation in decision-making about cardiovascular preventive drugs - resistance as agency.
    Hultberg J; Rudebeck CE
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2017 Sep; 35(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 28277056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.