These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27035621)

  • 1. Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.
    Lee JY; Kim JH; Kang DH; Chung DY; Lee DH; Do Jung H; Kwon JK; Cho KS
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():23988. PubMed ID: 27035621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.
    Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
    BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.
    Chang KD; Lee JY; Park SY; Kang DH; Lee HH; Cho KS
    Yonsei Med J; 2017 Sep; 58(5):1000-1005. PubMed ID: 28792145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.
    Niwa N; Matsumoto K; Miyahara M; Omura M; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Miyata K; Oya M
    World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 28220189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for proximal ureter stones: Can CT texture analysis technique help predict the therapeutic effect?
    Xun Y; Li J; Geng Y; Liu Z; Yu X; Wang X; Xiao F; Li Z; Li C; Wang S
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():84-89. PubMed ID: 30292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive factors and treatment outcomes of Steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: A Bayesian regression model analysis.
    Kang HW; Cho KS; Ham WS; Kang DH; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Mar; 59(2):112-118. PubMed ID: 29520387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.
    Park HS; Gong MK; Yoon CY; Moon du G; Cheon J; Choi YD
    J Endourol; 2016 Jul; 30(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 27042952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of colic pain as a significant factor for predicting the stone free rate of one-session shock wave lithotripsy for treating ureter stones: a Bayesian logistic regression model analysis.
    Chung DY; Cho KS; Lee DH; Han JH; Kang DH; Jung HD; Kown JK; Ham WS; Choi YD; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123800. PubMed ID: 25902059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?
    Lim KH; Jung JH; Kwon JH; Lee YS; Bae J; Cho MC; Lee KS; Lee HW
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 25598937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Langenauer J; Betschart P; Hechelhammer L; Güsewell S; Schmid HP; Engeler DS; Abt D; Zumstein V
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2073-2080. PubMed ID: 29845319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of electromagnetic extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on high-density ureteral stones.
    Bongrand B; Millet I; Autissier C; Faget C; Robert M
    Prog Urol; 2022 Jul; 32(8-9):608-615. PubMed ID: 35135703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal Skin-to-Stone Distance Is a Positive Predictor for Successful Outcomes in Upper Ureter Calculi following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach.
    Cho KS; Jung HD; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kang YJ; Jang WS; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144912. PubMed ID: 26659086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The usefulness of the maximum Hounsfield units (HU) in predicting the shockwave lithotripsy outcome for ureteral stones and the proposal of novel indicators using the maximum HU.
    Sugino Y; Kato T; Furuya S; Sasaki T; Arima K; Sugimura Y
    Urolithiasis; 2020 Feb; 48(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 30859262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.
    Geng JH; Tu HP; Shih PM; Shen JT; Jang MY; Wu WJ; Li CC; Chou YH; Juan YS
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 31(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25600918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.