These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27035621)
21. Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases. Yamashita S; Iwahashi Y; Deguchi R; Kikkawa K; Kohjimoto Y; Hara I Urolithiasis; 2020 Dec; 48(6):547-552. PubMed ID: 31993690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations. Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics. Galli R; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Martorana E; Rosa M; Mofferdin A; Bianchi G Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Apr; 69(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 27768022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors. Yazici O; Tuncer M; Sahin C; Demirkol MK; Kafkasli A; Sarica K Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26401859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: comparative study of stone depth in kidney and ureter treatments. Robert M; A'Ch S; Lanfrey P; Guiter J; Navratil H J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 10646673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The First 100 Cases of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Korea: Matched Cohort Analyses versus Shock-Wave Lithotripsy. Jung HD; Moon YJ; Almujalhem AJ; Alqahtani AA; Alkhureeb MA; Lee JY Yonsei Med J; 2022 May; 63(5):440-445. PubMed ID: 35512746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients. Guler Y; Erbin A; Kafkasli A; Ozmerdiven G Urolithiasis; 2021 Feb; 49(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 32279108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Storz Medical Lithotripsy Index Predicts Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteric Stones. Keskin SK; Spencer M; Turney BW Urol J; 2023 Jul; 20(4):203-207. PubMed ID: 37489026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A simple position to provide better imaging of upper ureteral stones close to the crista iliaca during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the Siemens Lithostar. Tansu N; Obek C; Onal B; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 15036682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Delivery Rates Achieves Excellent Outcomes for Ureteral Stones: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial. Nguyen DP; Hnilicka S; Kiss B; Seiler R; Thalmann GN; Roth B J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 25661296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variation Coefficient of Stone Density: A Novel Predictor of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy. Yamashita S; Kohjimoto Y; Iguchi T; Nishizawa S; Iba A; Kikkawa K; Hara I J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(4):384-390. PubMed ID: 28052698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of Case Volume on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Data from the National Shock Wave Lithotripsy Database of New Zealand. Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Hopkins D; Reynard JM; Turney BW J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):655-659. PubMed ID: 30963786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL. Sarica K; Kafkasli A; Yazici Ö; Çetinel AC; Demirkol MK; Tuncer M; Şahin C; Eryildirim B Urolithiasis; 2015 Feb; 43(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 25417717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study. Ouzaid I; Al-qahtani S; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Fernandez P; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Ravery V BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E438-42. PubMed ID: 22372937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review. Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of Patient Age and Stone Density in Predicting Outcomes of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Lower Ureteral Stones. Alsmadi J Med Arch; 2023; 77(3):222-226. PubMed ID: 37700921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Role of Stone Heterogeneity Index in Determining Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Urinary Calculi. Iqbal N; Hasan A; Nazar A; Iqbal S; Hassan MH; Gill BS; Khan R; Akhter S; Suarez-Ibarrola R J Clin Transl Res; 2021 Apr; 7(2):241-247. PubMed ID: 34104827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Triple D Score to Predict Stone-Free Status After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy. Ozgor F; Tosun M; Kayali Y; Savun M; Binbay M; Tepeler A J Endourol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 27889982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Upper and Lower Ureteral Stones in Non-obese and Non-Pre-stented Adults: Is One Session Sufficient? Alsmadi JK Cureus; 2022 Sep; 14(9):e29592. PubMed ID: 36176477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]