277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27036169)
1. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Diagnosis of Infected Nonunions.
Fischer C; Preuss EM; Tanner M; Bruckner T; Krix M; Amarteifio E; Miska M; Moghaddam-Alvandi A; Schmidmaier G; Weber MA
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):933-42. PubMed ID: 27036169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang L; Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Hua J; Wan CF
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1805-14. PubMed ID: 24065262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combination of 2- and 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced transvaginal sonography for diagnosis of small adnexal masses.
Hu R; Xiang H; Mu Y; Feng Y; Gu L; Liu H
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1889-99. PubMed ID: 25336475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is dynamic gadolinium enhancement needed in MR imaging for the preoperative assessment of scaphoidal viability in patients with scaphoid nonunion?
Donati OF; Zanetti M; Nagy L; Bode B; Schweizer A; Pfirrmann CW
Radiology; 2011 Sep; 260(3):808-16. PubMed ID: 21712471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI in displaying anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses.
D'Onofrio M; Megibow AJ; Faccioli N; Malagò R; Capelli P; Falconi M; Mucelli RP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1435-42. PubMed ID: 18029882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gadolinium-enhanced preoperative MRI scans as a prognostic parameter in scaphoid nonunion.
Megerle K; Worg H; Christopoulos G; Schmitt R; Krimmer H
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2011 Jan; 36(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20621936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of Region of Interest Drawing for Quantitative Analysis: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.
Nakata N; Ohta T; Nishioka M; Takeyama H; Toriumi Y; Kato K; Nogi H; Kamio M; Fukuda K
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1969-76. PubMed ID: 26384607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses.
Inan N; Arslan A; Akansel G; Anik Y; Balci NC; Demirci A
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps.
Sung YS; Kwon HJ; Park BW; Cho G; Lee CK; Cho KS; Kim JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Nov; 197(5):1122-9. PubMed ID: 22021504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign orbital masses.
Yuan Y; Kuai XP; Chen XS; Tao XF
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1506-11. PubMed ID: 23561057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benign and malignant breast lesions: efficacy of real time contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging.
Ricci P; Cantisani V; Ballesio L; Pagliara E; Sallusti E; Drudi FM; Trippa F; Calascibetta F; Erturk SM; Modesti M; Passariello R
Ultraschall Med; 2007 Feb; 28(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17304413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the detection of periampullary cancer: Comparison with B-mode ultrasonography and MR imaging.
Zhang T; Su ZZ; Wang P; Wu T; Tang W; Xu EJ; Ju JX; Quan XY; Zheng RQ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1993-2000. PubMed ID: 27776651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Tongue Cancer Using High-Resolution Sonography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Dhoot NM; Hazarika S; Choudhury B; Kataki AC; Baruah R; Goswami H
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Sep; 34(9):1537-46. PubMed ID: 26254154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-contrast-enhanced sonography for diagnosis of rectal lesions with pathologic correlation.
Lu M; Yan B; Song J; Ping W; Yue LX; Song B
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):575-83. PubMed ID: 24658937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement patterns of focal liver masses: discordance between contrast-enhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced CT and MRI.
Wilson SR; Kim TK; Jang HJ; Burns PN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):W7-W12. PubMed ID: 17579140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Focal Liver Lesions: Real-time 3-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Compared With 2-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Lee JC; Yan K; Lee SK; Yang W; Chen MH
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2015-2026. PubMed ID: 28646628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional contrast enhanced ultrasound score and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging score in evaluating breast tumor angiogenesis: correlation with biological factors.
Jia WR; Chai WM; Tang L; Wang Y; Fei XC; Han BS; Chen M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1098-1105. PubMed ID: 24794865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
