These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27036239)

  • 1. Heterogeneity of vocal sac inflation patterns in Odorrana tormota plays a role in call diversity.
    Zhang F; Zhao J; Chen P; Chen Z; Chen Y; Feng AS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1018-23. PubMed ID: 27036239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vocalizations of female frogs contain nonlinear characteristics and individual signatures.
    Zhang F; Zhao J; Feng AS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174815. PubMed ID: 28358859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic frogs call at a higher pitch in noisier ambiance.
    Zhang F; Chen P; Chen Z; Zhao J
    Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):996-1003. PubMed ID: 32256536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonic frogs show hyperacute phonotaxis to female courtship calls.
    Shen JX; Feng AS; Xu ZM; Yu ZL; Arch VS; Yu XJ; Narins PM
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):914-6. PubMed ID: 18469804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The vocal sac increases call rate in the Tungara frog Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Pauly GB; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2006; 79(4):708-19. PubMed ID: 16826497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency jumps and subharmonic components in calls of female Odorrana tormota differentially affect the vocal behaviors of male frogs.
    Wu Y; Luo X; Chen P; Zhang F
    Front Zool; 2023 Dec; 20(1):39. PubMed ID: 38062453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of bioacoustical traits in the genus Physalaemus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae).
    Hepp F; Pombal JPJ
    Zootaxa; 2020 Jan; 4725(1):zootaxa.4725.1.1. PubMed ID: 32230594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Floating frogs sound larger: environmental constraints on signal production drives call frequency changes.
    Goutte S; Muñoz MI; Ryan MJ; Halfwerk W
    Naturwissenschaften; 2020 Sep; 107(5):41. PubMed ID: 32970183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sound Classification and Call Discrimination Are Decoded in Order as Revealed by Event-Related Potential Components in Frogs.
    Fang G; Yang P; Xue F; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Brain Behav Evol; 2015; 86(3-4):232-45. PubMed ID: 26613526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Male antiphonal calls and phonotaxis evoked by female courtship calls in the large odorous frog (Odorrana graminea).
    Shen JX; Xu ZM; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2023 Jan; 209(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 35939131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elastic structures in the vocalization apparatus of the Túngara frog Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae).
    Jaramillo C; Rand AS; Ibáñez R; Dudley R
    J Morphol; 1997 Sep; 233(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 9259126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of mating calls and adaptive strategies of Amolops wuyiensis and Odorrana tormotus (Anura) in noise-controlled environments].
    Zhang F; Chen P; Zhao SY
    Dongwuxue Yanjiu; 2013 Jun; 34(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 23775995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative acoustic analysis of the vocal repertoire of the golden rocket frog (Anomaloglossus beebei).
    Pettitt BA; Bourne GR; Bee MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4811-20. PubMed ID: 22712952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The vocal repertoire of the Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli).
    Soltis J; Alligood CA; Blowers TE; Savage A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3550-8. PubMed ID: 23145634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vocal acoustics in the endangered proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus).
    Röper KM; Scheumann M; Wiechert AB; Nathan S; Goossens B; Owren MJ; Zimmermann E
    Am J Primatol; 2014 Feb; 76(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 24123122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus).
    Feng AS; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2008 Feb; 194(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 18228079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The vocal sac of Hylodidae (Amphibia, Anura): Phylogenetic and functional implications of a unique morphology.
    Elias-Costa AJ; Montesinos R; Grant T; Faivovich J
    J Morphol; 2017 Nov; 278(11):1506-1516. PubMed ID: 28744917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differences in the vocal repertoire of adult red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus): A multi-level acoustic analysis.
    Bouchet H; Pellier AS; Blois-Heulin C; Lemasson A
    Am J Primatol; 2010 Apr; 72(4):360-75. PubMed ID: 20052691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The source-filter theory of whistle-like calls in marmosets: Acoustic analysis and simulation of helium-modulated voices.
    Koda H; Tokuda IT; Wakita M; Ito T; Nishimura T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3068-76. PubMed ID: 26093398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.