These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27036267)
1. Auditory masking of speech in reverberant multi-talker environments. Weller T; Buchholz JM; Best V J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1303-13. PubMed ID: 27036267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of informational masking in reverberant, multi-talker environments. Westermann A; Buchholz JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):584-93. PubMed ID: 26328677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech detection and localization in a reverberant multitalker environment by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Buchholz JM; Best V J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):1469. PubMed ID: 32237797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction. Wu YH; Bentler RA Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources. Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of spatial separation in distance on the intelligibility of speech in rooms. Westermann A; Buchholz JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):757-67. PubMed ID: 25698010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrimination of virtual auditory distance using level and direct-to-reverberant ratio cues. Kolarik A; Cirstea S; Pardhan S J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3395-8. PubMed ID: 24180748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of reverberation on a listener's ability to recognize target sentences in the presence of up to three synchronized masking sentences. Abouchacra KS; Besing J; Koehnke J; Letowski T Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 21668326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults. Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments. Ricketts TA; Picou EM Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Bernstein JG; Grant KW J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet. Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]