These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language. Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The ageing voice: changes in fundamental frequency, waveform stability and spectrum. Decoster W; Debruyne F Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1997; 51(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 9241377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigating the relationship between average speaker fundamental frequency and acoustic vowel space size. Weirich M; Simpson A J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2965-74. PubMed ID: 24116432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Perceptual and Acoustic Analyses of Good Voice Quality in Male Radio Performers. Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Ternström S; Yiu E; Heard R J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):259.e1-259.e12. PubMed ID: 27342753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children. Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures. Jannetts S; Lowit A J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Differences in self-rated, perceived, and acoustic voice qualities between high- and low-fatigue groups. Cho SW; Yin CS; Park YB; Park YJ J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 21051198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acoustic voice characteristics with and without wearing a facemask. Nguyen DD; McCabe P; Thomas D; Purcell A; Doble M; Novakovic D; Chacon A; Madill C Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5651. PubMed ID: 33707509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Voice change in end-stage renal disease patients after hemodialysis: correlation of subjective hoarseness and objective acoustic parameters. Jung SY; Ryu JH; Park HS; Chung SM; Ryu DR; Kim HS J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 24275458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation of the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID) as a Screening Tool for Voice Disorders: Development of Clinical Cutoff Scores. Awan SN; Roy N; Zhang D; Cohen SM J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 26361215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech. Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The psychophysics of roughness applied to dysphonic voice. Eddins DA; Kopf LM; Shrivastav R J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3820-5. PubMed ID: 26723336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acoustic analyses of thyroidectomy-related changes in vowel phonation. Solomon NP; Awan SN; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):711-20. PubMed ID: 23177742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Moderating Effect of Frequent Singing on Voice Aging. Lortie CL; Rivard J; Thibeault M; Tremblay P J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):112.e1-112.e12. PubMed ID: 27049451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]