These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27036287)

  • 1. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception.
    Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL51-6. PubMed ID: 27036287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Free RH; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL159-65. PubMed ID: 24606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No Musician Advantage in the Perception of Degraded-Fundamental Frequency Speech in Noisy Environments.
    Hsieh IH; Guo YJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 66(8):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 37499233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K; Sharma M; Ibrahim RK; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians.
    Donai JJ; Jennings MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):EL128. PubMed ID: 27250197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech-in-noise perception in musicians: A review.
    Coffey EBJ; Mogilever NB; Zatorre RJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 352():49-69. PubMed ID: 28213134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Similar abilities of musicians and non-musicians to segregate voices by fundamental frequency.
    Deroche MLD; Limb CJ; Chatterjee M; Gracco VL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):1739. PubMed ID: 29092612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise and pitch interact during the cortical segregation of concurrent speech.
    Bidelman GM; Yellamsetty A
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():34-44. PubMed ID: 28578876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
    Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations?
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Maat B; Free RH; Başkent D
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():179. PubMed ID: 25071428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.
    Anderson S; Skoe E; Chandrasekaran B; Zecker S; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):151-7. PubMed ID: 20708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Musical Training on Speech Detection in the Presence of Informational and Energetic Masking.
    Morse-Fortier C; Parrish MM; Baran JA; Freyman RL
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517739427. PubMed ID: 29161982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults.
    Anderson S; White-Schwoch T; Parbery-Clark A; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 300():18-32. PubMed ID: 23541911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds.
    Madsen SMK; Whiteford KL; Oxenham AJ
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12624. PubMed ID: 28974705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory training to improve speech perception in noise across languages.
    Ingvalson EM; Dhar S; Wong PC; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3477-86. PubMed ID: 26093435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.