373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2703655)
1. Tax reform legislation and the formation of optometric group practices.
Cobb CH
J Am Optom Assoc; 1989 Feb; 60(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2703655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes for physicians, physician corporations under Tax Reform Act.
Clarke LS
W V Med J; 1986 Dec; 82(12):487-8. PubMed ID: 3468678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What physicians should know about the new personal service corporation tax laws.
Erickson PR
Tex Med; 1988 Nov; 84(11):71-2. PubMed ID: 3238620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Minnesota Limited Liability Company Act. Physician groups likely to find new law beneficial.
Steffen JK
Minn Med; 1992 Nov; 75(11):37-9. PubMed ID: 1435648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Professional corporations and partnerships: some contrasts.
Hannah HW
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1982 Jul; 181(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 7107484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tax-exempt status can boost group practice benefits.
Bromberg RS
Hosp Med Staff; 1980 Jul; 9(7):13-21. PubMed ID: 10247651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Limited liability companies: the entity-of-choice is now available for Tennessee physicians.
Griffith JL
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1994 Oct; 87(10):439-40. PubMed ID: 7990457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The tax-exempt clinic. Is it right for your practice?
Friedemann KJ; Platt JB
Minn Med; 1991 Mar; 74(3):39-40. PubMed ID: 2030678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Revenue Act of 1978: tax reform legislation continues.
Komensky AM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Apr; 98(4):565-8. PubMed ID: 285131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structuring group medical practices: tax planning aspects.
Gassman AS; Conetta TF
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(3):47-55. PubMed ID: 10119378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The top-heavy plan rules: what will they do to your retirement plan?
Rogers WR; Dibble JM
N C Med J; 1985 Jan; 46(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 3856112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Choice of legal entity for the medical group: a tax overview.
Gummerman D
Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10293726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New tax law puts kink in retirement plan arrangements.
Beck LC
Pa Med; 1981 Apr; 84(4):43-4. PubMed ID: 7232004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctor's plan disqualified for not meeting 70% rule; Sec. 83 triggers taxation.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Sep; 32(3):46, 48. PubMed ID: 10277873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New tax law affects practice structure, retirement.
Anders GT; Beck LC; Martin JT; Gannon MJ
Pa Med; 1982 Oct; 85(10):36-8, 41. PubMed ID: 6891771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Why should the dentist incorporate his practice? Should the incorporated dentist consent to a Subchapter S election?
Dale WJ
J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1978; 57(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 290691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 on the retirement plans and professional corporations of physicians.
Gray WA
J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Dec; 71(12):885-9. PubMed ID: 7153683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reclassifying physicians as employees for Federal tax purposes.
Borders TC; Halpern M
Healthc Financ Manage; 1994 Feb; 48(2):38, 40-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10145952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The corporate practice doctrine: is it still viable?
Manger JA; Cowell LJ
Healthspan; 1989 Apr; 6(4):3-10. PubMed ID: 10303451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New legal trap for the incorporated physician.
Popper RJ
Del Med J; 1991 Jul; 63(7):429-30. PubMed ID: 1894076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
