223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27036566)
21. Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study.
Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Giger ML; Boone JM; Lindfors KK; Yang K
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):866-73. PubMed ID: 22320796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):7092-7112. PubMed ID: 27648708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast Cancer: Computer-aided Detection with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Morra L; Sacchetto D; Durando M; Agliozzo S; Carbonaro LA; Delsanto S; Pesce B; Persano D; Mariscotti G; Marra V; Fonio P; Bert A
Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25961633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combination of computer-aided detection algorithms for automatic lung nodule identification.
Camarlinghi N; Gori I; Retico A; Bellotti R; Bosco P; Cerello P; Gargano G; Lopez Torres E; Megna R; Peccarisi M; Fantacci ME
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 May; 7(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 21739112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings.
Zheng B; Ganott MA; Britton CA; Hakim CM; Hardesty LA; Chang TS; Rockette HE; Gur D
Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 11719657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving mass candidate detection in mammograms via feature maxima propagation and local feature selection.
Melendez J; Sánchez CI; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081904. PubMed ID: 25086535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Metric for Reducing False Positives in the Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Screening Examinations of High-Risk Women.
Levman JE; Gallego-Ortiz C; Warner E; Causer P; Martel AL
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 26293705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast density classification to reduce false positives in CADe systems.
Vállez N; Bueno G; Déniz O; Dorado J; Seoane JA; Pazos A; Pastor C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Feb; 113(2):569-84. PubMed ID: 24286729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology.
Betal D; Roberts N; Whitehouse GH
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):903-17. PubMed ID: 9486066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Eigendetection of masses considering false positive reduction and breast density information.
Freixenet J; Oliver A; Martí R; Lladó X; Pont J; Pérez E; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1840-53. PubMed ID: 18561659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Feasibility study for the improvement of microcalcification visualization in different breast thicknesses and tissue components using a dual-energy approach in digital mammography.
Tsai CJ; Chen RC; Hung SH; Wu J; Peng HL; Lee JJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 22805681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Simplified computer-aided detection scheme of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis images.
Ji-Wook Jeong ; Seung-Hoon Chae ; Eun Young Chae ; Hak Hee Kim ; Young Wook Choi ; Sooyeul Lee
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1070-1073. PubMed ID: 28268510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Zhang W; Doi K; Giger ML; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 8860907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automatic detection of microcalcifications using mathematical morphology and a support vector machine.
Zhang E; Wang F; Li Y; Bai X
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24211882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Detection of coronary calcifications from computed tomography scans for automated risk assessment of coronary artery disease.
Isgum I; Rutten A; Prokop M; van Ginneken B
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1450-61. PubMed ID: 17500476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
