156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27037007)
1. The Influence of Disease Severity of Preceding Clinical Cases on Pathologists' Medical Decision Making.
Frederick PD; Nelson HD; Carney PA; Brunyé TT; Allison KH; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Med Decis Making; 2017 Jan; 37(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 27037007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.
Elmore JG; Longton GM; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Allison KH; Schnitt SJ; O'Malley FP; Weaver DL
JAMA; 2015 Mar; 313(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 25781441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.
Onega T; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Tosteson ANA; Carney PA; Geller BM; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Oster NV; Pepe MS; Elmore JG
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 80():39-47. PubMed ID: 28535496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy is in the eyes of the pathologist: The visual interpretive process and diagnostic accuracy with digital whole slide images.
Brunyé TT; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
J Biomed Inform; 2017 Feb; 66():171-179. PubMed ID: 28087402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective.
Elmore JG; Nelson HD; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Tosteson AN; Geller B; Onega T; Carney PA; Jackson SL; Allison KH; Weaver DL
Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):649-55. PubMed ID: 26999810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time?
Jackson SL; Frederick PD; Pepe MS; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Allison KH; Carney PA; Geller BM; Tosteson AN; Onega T; Elmore JG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241. PubMed ID: 27913946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Machine Learning of Breast Pathology Structures for Automated Differentiation of Breast Cancer and High-Risk Proliferative Lesions.
Mercan E; Mehta S; Bartlett J; Shapiro LG; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e198777. PubMed ID: 31397859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Region of interest identification and diagnostic agreement in breast pathology.
Nagarkar DB; Mercan E; Weaver DL; Brunyé TT; Carney PA; Rendi MH; Beck AH; Frederick PD; Shapiro LG; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1004-11. PubMed ID: 27198567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathologists' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study.
Elmore JG; Barnhill RL; Elder DE; Longton GM; Pepe MS; Reisch LM; Carney PA; Titus LJ; Nelson HD; Onega T; Tosteson ANA; Weinstock MA; Knezevich SR; Piepkorn MW
BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2813. PubMed ID: 28659278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.
Samples LS; Rendi MH; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Nelson HD; Morgan TR; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():34-43. PubMed ID: 28475933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Interobserver reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of borderline ductal proliferative breast diseases].
Wei B; Bu H; Zhu CR; Guo LX; Chen HJ; Zhao C; Zhang P; Chen DY; Tang Y; Jiang Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Nov; 35(6):849-53. PubMed ID: 15573772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying and processing the gap between perceived and actual agreement in breast pathology interpretation.
Carney PA; Allison KH; Oster NV; Frederick PD; Morgan TR; Geller BM; Weaver DL; Elmore JG
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):717-26. PubMed ID: 27056072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Bordering on Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Tozbikian G; Brogi E; Vallejo CE; Giri D; Murray M; Catalano J; Olcese C; Van Zee KJ; Wen HY
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 25(2):100-107. PubMed ID: 27481892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: diagnostic agreement and management implications.
Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2016 Nov; 69(5):862-870. PubMed ID: 27270947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors associated with upgrading to malignancy at surgery of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed on core biopsy.
Deshaies I; Provencher L; Jacob S; Côté G; Robert J; Desbiens C; Poirier B; Hogue JC; Vachon E; Diorio C
Breast; 2011 Feb; 20(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 20619647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).
Kluttig A; Trocchi P; Heinig A; Holzhausen HJ; Taege C; Hauptmann S; Boecker W; Decker T; Loening T; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Thomssen C; Lantzsch T; Buchmann J; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7():100. PubMed ID: 17570833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. BI-RADS-MRI terminology and evaluation of intraductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Tozaki M
Breast Cancer; 2013 Jan; 20(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 22109641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology in breast carcinoma.
Krishnamurthy S; Sneige N; Thompson PA; Marcy SM; Singletary SE; Cristofanilli M; Hunt KK; Kuerer HM
Cancer; 2003 Apr; 99(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12704689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Bieling HB; Wardelmann E; Leutner CC; Koenig R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
Lancet; 2007 Aug; 370(9586):485-92. PubMed ID: 17693177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
