176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27037161)
1. Educating jurors about eyewitness testimony in criminal cases with circumstantial and forensic evidence.
Safer MA; Murphy RP; Wise RA; Bussey L; Millett C; Holfeld B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():86-92. PubMed ID: 27037161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved?
Wise RA; Kehn A
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 32944129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
Eastwood J; Caldwell J
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More on the discredibility of eyewitnesses.
Elliott R
Psychol Rep; 1990 Dec; 67(3 Pt 2):1211-5. PubMed ID: 2084747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?
Buck JA; London K; Wright DB
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 20443056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential jurors' opinions on the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness identification: a brief communication.
Labelle L; Lamarche MC; Laurence JR
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 2258247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.
Wells GL; Memon A; Penrod SD
Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Nov; 7(2):45-75. PubMed ID: 26158855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.
LaBat DE; Goldfarb D; Evans JR; Compo NS; Koolmees CJ; LaPorte G; Lothridge K
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Oct; 47(5):566-578. PubMed ID: 37603005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
Slane CR; Dodson CS
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychological aspects of courtroom testimony.
Loftus EF
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 347():27-37. PubMed ID: 6930909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mock-juror evaluations of traditional and ratings-based eyewitness identification evidence.
Sauer JD; Palmer MA; Brewer N
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Aug; 41(4):375-384. PubMed ID: 28191988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
Henderson KS; Levett LM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research.
Wells GL; Malpass RS; Lindsay RC; Fisher RP; Turtle JW; Fulero SM
Am Psychol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):581-98. PubMed ID: 10892200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of forensic evidence for decisions on criminal guilt.
Ling S; Kaplan J; Berryessa CM
Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33736846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
Devenport JL; Cutler BL
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: the state of the law and the science.
Penrod SD; Fulero SM; Cutler BL
Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):229-59. PubMed ID: 10150378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Jurors' perceptions of forensic science expert witnesses: Experience, qualifications, testimony style and credibility.
McCarthy Wilcox A; NicDaeid N
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():100-108. PubMed ID: 30216840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The bottom line: the effect of written expert witness statements on juror verdicts and information processing.
ForsterLee L; Horowitz I; Athaide-Victor E; Brown N
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Apr; 24(2):259-70. PubMed ID: 10810841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
