These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27037161)

  • 61. The Griffiths Question Map: A Forensic Tool For Expert Witnesses' Assessments of Witnesses and Victims' Statements.
    Dodier O; Denault V
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):266-274. PubMed ID: 28240349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Psychiatric evidence on the ultimate issue.
    Buchanan A
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006; 34(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 16585229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The emotional eyewitness: the effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance.
    Houston KA; Clifford BR; Phillips LH; Memon A
    Emotion; 2013 Feb; 13(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 22775133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.
    Pearson JM; Law JR; Skene JAG; Beskind DH; Vidmar N; Ball DA; Malekpour A; Carter RM; Skene JHP
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Nov; 2(11):856-866. PubMed ID: 30931399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence.
    Wells GL; Kovera MB; Douglass AB; Brewer N; Meissner CA; Wixted JT
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 32027160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Spontaneous hypnosis in the forensic context.
    Beahrs JO
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 2667657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Forensic psychiatry, neuroscience, and the law.
    Silva JA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):489-502. PubMed ID: 20018997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A field evaluation of the Eye-Closure Interview with witnesses of serious crimes.
    Vredeveldt A; Tredoux CG; Nortje A; Kempen K; Puljević C; Labuschagne GN
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 25384065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Commentary: expert testimony as a potential asset in defense of capital sentencing cases.
    Edersheim JG; Beck JC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 16394229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Four utilities in eyewitness identification practice: Dissociations between receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and expected utility analysis.
    Lampinen JM; Smith AM; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):26-44. PubMed ID: 30382722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [A testimony procedure of forensic psychiatry used for criminal cases].
    Chen XS
    Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Apr; 24(2):66-7, 123. PubMed ID: 1860382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Trial by jury; a pilot study of juror perception of mental health professional testimony in NGRI pleas for first degree international homicide.
    Palermo GB; Smith MB; Gram LC; Zier W; Kohler ME
    Med Law; 1996; 15(1):17-42. PubMed ID: 8691998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The expression and interpretation of uncertain forensic science evidence: verbal equivalence, evidence strength, and the weak evidence effect.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI; Watkins I; Sayle MA; Newell BR
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Jun; 37(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 23750600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Earwitness recall and identification: comparison of the cognitive interview and the structured interview.
    Memon A; Yarmey AD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 1):797-807. PubMed ID: 10407887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Forensic psychiatric testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
    Slovenko R
    Leg Med; 1995; ():241-60. PubMed ID: 8788672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Individual versus group decision making: Jurors' reliance on central and peripheral information to evaluate expert testimony.
    Salerno JM; Bottoms BL; Peter-Hagene LC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183580. PubMed ID: 28931011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: a test of the five Biggers criteria.
    Bradfield AL; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Oct; 24(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 11026212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.