358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27037202)
1. A model to predict survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy based on tumour site, stage and lymph node ratio.
Dasari BV; Roberts KJ; Hodson J; Stevens L; Smith AM; Hubscher SG; Isaac J; Muiesan P; Sutcliffe RP; Marudanayagam R; Mirza DF
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Apr; 18(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 27037202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma.
Kiriyama M; Ebata T; Aoba T; Kaneoka Y; Arai T; Shimizu Y; Nagino M;
Br J Surg; 2015 Mar; 102(4):399-406. PubMed ID: 25611179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic indicators following curative pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma: A retrospective multivariate analysis of a single centre experience.
Petrou A; Soonawalla Z; Silva MA; Manzelli A; Moris D; Tabet PP; Friend P
J BUON; 2016; 21(4):874-882. PubMed ID: 27685908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels and post-operative lymph node ratio are important predictors of survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Sanjay P; de Figueiredo RS; Leaver H; Ogston S; Kulli C; Polignano FM; Tait IS
JOP; 2012 Mar; 13(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 22406601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between metastatic lymph node ratio and prognosis in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Zhang JW; Chu YM; Lan ZM; Tang XL; Chen YT; Wang CF; Che X
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 21(14):4255-60. PubMed ID: 25892876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor for patients with resectable middle and distal bile duct carcinoma.
Kawai M; Tani M; Kobayashi Y; Tsuji T; Tabuse K; Horiuchi T; Oka M; Yamaguchi K; Sakata Y; Shimomura T; Yamaue H
Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 19596119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Robinson SM; Rahman A; Haugk B; French JJ; Manas DM; Jaques BC; Charnley RM; White SA
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 22317758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does blood group affect survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancy?
Khalil K; Bansal S; Ayaani S; Hodson J; Lam FT; Khan S; Ahmad J; Isaac J; Muiesan P; Mirza D; Dasari B; Marudanayagam R; Sutcliffe RP; Marangoni G; Roberts KJ
HPB (Oxford); 2018 Sep; 20(9):848-853. PubMed ID: 29705345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Defining an Optimal Prognostic Lymph Node Stratification Schema.
Kim Y; Spolverato G; Amini N; Margonis GA; Gupta R; Ejaz A; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 22(8):2772-8. PubMed ID: 25663595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pancreatic cancer metastatic to a limited number of lymph nodes has no impact on outcome.
Baldwin S; Kukar M; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Wilkinson N; Hochwald SN; Kuvshinoff B
HPB (Oxford); 2016 Jun; 18(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 27317957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas.
Farid SG; Falk GA; Joyce D; Chalikonda S; Walsh RM; Smith AM; Morris-Stiff G
HPB (Oxford); 2014 Jun; 16(6):582-91. PubMed ID: 23777362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer.
Tol JA; Brosens LA; van Dieren S; van Gulik TM; Busch OR; Besselink MG; Gouma DJ
Br J Surg; 2015 Feb; 102(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25529117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic Significance of the Lymph Node Ratio in Surgical Patients With Distal Cholangiocarcinoma.
Li X; Lin H; Sun Y; Gong J; Feng H; Tu J
J Surg Res; 2019 Apr; 236():2-11. PubMed ID: 30694756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the extent of lymphadenectomy, number of lymph nodes, positive lymph node ratio and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio impact surgical outcome of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma?
Hakeem AR; Marangoni G; Chapman SJ; Young RS; Nair A; Hidalgo EL; Toogood GJ; Wyatt JI; Lodge PA; Prasad KR
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Sep; 26(9):1047-54. PubMed ID: 25051217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors predicting adequate lymph node yield in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for malignancy.
Sierzega M; Bobrzyński Ł; Matyja A; Kulig J
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 14(1):248. PubMed ID: 27644962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pancreas exocrine replacement therapy is associated with increased survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancy.
Roberts KJ; Schrem H; Hodson J; Angelico R; Dasari BVM; Coldham CA; Marudanayagam R; Sutcliffe RP; Muiesan P; Isaac J; Mirza DF
HPB (Oxford); 2017 Oct; 19(10):859-867. PubMed ID: 28711377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does lymph node ratio impact survival in resected periampullary malignancies?
Hurtuk MG; Hughes C; Shoup M; Aranha GV
Am J Surg; 2009 Mar; 197(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 19245913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superior Mesenteric Artery Margin of Posttherapy Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Prognosis in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Liu L; Katz MH; Lee SM; Fischer LK; Prakash L; Parker N; Wang H; Varadhachary GR; Wolff RA; Lee JE; Pisters PW; Maitra A; Fleming JB; Estrella J; Rashid A; Wang H
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1395-403. PubMed ID: 26200098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic relevance of lymph node ratio following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
Pawlik TM; Gleisner AL; Cameron JL; Winter JM; Assumpcao L; Lillemoe KD; Wolfgang C; Hruban RH; Schulick RD; Yeo CJ; Choti MA
Surgery; 2007 May; 141(5):610-8. PubMed ID: 17462460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic factors affecting survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (single center experience).
El Nakeeb A; El Shobary M; El Dosoky M; Nabeh A; El Sorogy M; El Eneen AA; abu Zeid M; Elwahab MA
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014; 61(133):1426-38. PubMed ID: 25436321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
