These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27037461)

  • 1. Economic implications of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology embryo transfer guidelines: healthcare dollars saved by reducing iatrogenic triplets.
    Lee MS; Evans BT; Stern AD; Hornstein MD
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):189-195.e3. PubMed ID: 27037461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How compliant are in vitro fertilization member clinics in following embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 59,689 fresh first in vitro fertilization autologous cycles from 2011 to 2012.
    Keyhan S; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):645-652.e1. PubMed ID: 27268276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Mneimneh AS; Perkins KM; Jamieson DJ; Zhang Y; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 26604068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do donor oocyte cycles comply with ASRM/SART embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 13,393 donor cycles from the SART registry.
    Acharya KS; Keyhan S; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 27183048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization.
    Min JK; Hughes E; Young D; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2010 Apr; 32(4):363-377. PubMed ID: 20500945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?
    Glujovsky D; Farquhar C
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 27421614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with birth outcomes from cryopreserved blastocysts: experience from 4,597 autologous transfers of 7,597 cryopreserved blastocysts.
    Richter KS; Ginsburg DK; Shipley SK; Lim J; Tucker MJ; Graham JR; Levy MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):354-362.e2. PubMed ID: 27172399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
    Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.
    Somigliana E; Busnelli A; Paffoni A; Vigano P; Riccaboni A; Rubio C; Capalbo A
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Jun; 111(6):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 30777289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 30 years of data: impact of the United States in vitro fertilization data registry on advancing fertility care.
    Jain T; Grainger DA; Ball GD; Gibbons WE; Rebar RW; Robins JC; Leach RE
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Mar; 111(3):477-488. PubMed ID: 30737003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women aged 35 to 42 years from the PURSUE randomized clinical trial.
    Boostanfar R; Gates D; Guan Y; Gordon K; McCrary Sisk C; Stegmann BJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):300-305.e5. PubMed ID: 27090863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost of transferring one through five embryos per in vitro fertilization cycle from various payor perspectives.
    Little SE; Ratcliffe J; Caughey AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):593-601. PubMed ID: 16946220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.