529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27038228)
21. Endocervical glandular involvement, multicentricity, and extent of the disease are features of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Güdücü N; Sidar G; Başsüllü N; Türkmen I; Dünder I
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):345-6. PubMed ID: 23665088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision.
Cardoza-Favarato G; Fadare O
Hum Pathol; 2007 May; 38(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 17316761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.
Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Human papillomavirus combined with cytology and margin status identifies patients at risk for recurrence after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ruano Y; Torrents M; Ferrer FJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2015; 36(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 26189247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictors of high-grade residual disease after repeat conization in patients with positive surgical margins.
Minareci Y; Ak N; Tosun OA; Sozen H; Disci R; Topuz S; Salihoglu MY
Ginekol Pol; 2022; 93(12):962-967. PubMed ID: 35894500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. HPV determination in the control after LEEP due to CIN II-III: prospective study and predictive model.
Fuste P; Bellosillo B; Santamaria X; Mancebo G; Mariñoso L; Alameda F; Espinet B; Sole F; Serrano S; Carreras R
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2009 Mar; 28(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 19188824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Long-term outcomes of photodynamic therapy for a positive resection margin after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Kim M; Choi MC; Lee C; Na YJ; Kim SJ
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102639. PubMed ID: 34823035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Association of menopause, aging and treatment procedures with positive margins after therapeutic cervical conization for CIN 3: a retrospective study of 8,856 patients by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Ikeda M; Mikami M; Yasaka M; Enomoto T; Kobayashi Y; Nagase S; Yokoyama M; Katabuchi H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Sep; 32(5):e68. PubMed ID: 34132067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions.
Simões RB; Campaner AB
APMIS; 2013 Dec; 121(12):1153-61. PubMed ID: 23607318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a valuable method for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Fan Q; Tay SK; Shen K
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 May; 36(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 11783374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Diagnosis and treatment value of colposcopy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure in microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of 135 cases].
Xiao FY; Wang Q; Zheng RL; Chen M; Su TT; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 27030497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Risk factors analysis of recurrent disease after treatment with a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Ding T; Li L; Duan R; Chen Y; Yang B; Xi M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Feb; 160(2):538-547. PubMed ID: 35810389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management.
Chen Y; Lu H; Wan X; Lv W; Xie X
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 19628208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Photodynamic therapy for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III in young patients and obstetric outcomes.
Choi MC; Jung SG; Park H; Lee SY; Lee C; Hwang YY; Kim SJ
Lasers Surg Med; 2013 Nov; 45(9):564-72. PubMed ID: 24136239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A retrospective study for long-term oncologic and obstetric outcomes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure: focus on surgical margin and human papillomavirus.
Cho A; Kim MY; Park IS; Park CM
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):116. PubMed ID: 38347568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical predictors of residual disease in hysterectomy following a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Wu Q; Jiang Y; Ding J; Xia L; Xu H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Dec; 22(1):971. PubMed ID: 36575366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
