These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27038322)

  • 21. The Word Outside and the Pictures in Our Heads: Contingent Framing Effects of Labels on Health Policy Preferences by Political Ideology.
    Roh S; Niederdeppe J
    Health Commun; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1063-71. PubMed ID: 26799756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Should support for obesity interventions or perceptions of their perceived effectiveness shape policy?
    Gendall P; Hoek J; Taylor R; Mann J; Krebs J; Parry-Strong A
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Apr; 39(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 25716535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Public Attitudes and Support for a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in America's Heartland.
    Curry LE; Rogers T; Williams P; Homsi G; Willett J; Schmitt CL
    Health Promot Pract; 2018 May; 19(3):418-426. PubMed ID: 28587533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Young adults: beloved by food and drink marketers and forgotten by public health?
    Freeman B; Kelly B; Vandevijvere S; Baur L
    Health Promot Int; 2016 Dec; 31(4):954-961. PubMed ID: 26276799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Food marketing to children in the United States: Can industry voluntarily do the right thing for children's health?
    Fleming-Milici F; Harris JL
    Physiol Behav; 2020 Dec; 227():113139. PubMed ID: 32810480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How are frames generated? Insights from the industry lobby against the sugar tax in Ireland.
    Campbell N; Mialon M; Reilly K; Browne S; Finucane FM
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Nov; 264():113215. PubMed ID: 32889504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors of US public school children.
    Briefel RR; Crepinsek MK; Cabili C; Wilson A; Gleason PM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Feb; 109(2 Suppl):S91-107. PubMed ID: 19166677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Restricting Advertisements for High-Fat, High-Sugar Foods during Children's Television Programs: Attitudes in a US Population-Based Sample.
    Tripicchio G; Heo M; Diewald L; Noar SM; Dooley R; Pietrobelli A; Burger KS; Faith MS
    Child Obes; 2016 Apr; 12(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 26977541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The extent to which school district competitive food and beverage policies align with the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: implications for federal regulations.
    Schneider LM; Schermbeck RM; Chriqui JF; Chaloupka FJ
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Jun; 112(6):892-6. PubMed ID: 22507758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Competing with big business: a randomised experiment testing the effects of messages to promote alcohol and sugary drink control policy.
    Scully M; Brennan E; Durkin S; Dixon H; Wakefield M; Barry CL; Niederdeppe J
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Dec; 17(1):945. PubMed ID: 29282031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of fast food branding on young children's taste preferences.
    Robinson TN; Borzekowski DL; Matheson DM; Kraemer HC
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2007 Aug; 161(8):792-7. PubMed ID: 17679662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Response of the food and beverage industry to the obesity threat.
    Koplan JP; Brownell KD
    JAMA; 2010 Oct; 304(13):1487-8. PubMed ID: 20924016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting support for restricting food marketing to youth.
    Goren A; Harris JL; Schwartz MB; Brownell KD
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010; 29(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 20194982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Availability and consumption of competitive foods in US public schools.
    Fox MK; Gordon A; Nogales R; Wilson A
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Feb; 109(2 Suppl):S57-66. PubMed ID: 19166673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. School wellness policies and foods and beverages available in schools.
    Hood NE; Colabianchi N; Terry-McElrath YM; O'Malley PM; Johnston LD
    Am J Prev Med; 2013 Aug; 45(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 23867020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Benchmarking Food and Beverage Companies on Obesity Prevention and Nutrition Policies: Evaluation of the BIA-Obesity Australia Initiative, 2017-2019.
    Robinson E; Blake MR; Sacks G
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2021 Dec; 10(12):857-870. PubMed ID: 32861228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sweet promises: Candy advertising to children and implications for industry self-regulation.
    Harris JL; LoDolce M; Dembek C; Schwartz MB
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():585-92. PubMed ID: 26232330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The food and beverage vending environment in health care facilities participating in the healthy eating, active communities program.
    Lawrence S; Boyle M; Craypo L; Samuels S
    Pediatrics; 2009 Jun; 123 Suppl 5():S287-92. PubMed ID: 19470605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survey of antiobesity legislation: are these laws working?
    Downey M; Still C
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2012 Oct; 19(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 22895357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breakfast cereal industry pledges to self-regulate advertising to youth: will they improve the marketing landscape?
    Schwartz MB; Ross C; Harris JL; Jernigan DH; Siegel M; Ostroff J; Brownell KD
    J Public Health Policy; 2010 Apr; 31(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 20200526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.