These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27038340)

  • 1. Inter-Rater Agreement of Pressure Ulcer Risk and Prevention Measures in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators(®) (NDNQI).
    Waugh SM; Bergquist-Beringer S
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Jun; 39(3):164-74. PubMed ID: 27038340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pressure Ulcer Risk and Prevention Practices in Pediatric Patients: A Secondary Analysis of Data from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators®.
    Razmus I; Bergquist-Beringer S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Jan; 63(2):28-32. PubMed ID: 28267681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods and Processes Used to Collect Pressure Injury Risk and Prevention Measures in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators® (NDNQI®).
    Waugh SM; Bergquist-Beringer S
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2020; 35(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 31290782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric properties of the Dutch National Prevalence Measurement of Care Problems used to measure quality of pressure ulcer care in Indonesian hospitals.
    Amir Y; Kottner J; Schols JM; Lohrmann C; Halfens RJ
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Aug; 27(8):363-70. PubMed ID: 25033311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator.
    Hart S; Bergquist S; Gajewski B; Dunton N
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2006; 21(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 16816607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explaining the national differences in pressure ulcer prevalence between the Netherlands and Germany--adjusted for personal risk factors and institutional quality indicators.
    Tannen A; Dietz E; Dassen T; Halfens R
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 19239586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality improvement in nursing homes in Texas: results from a pressure ulcer prevention project.
    Abel RL; Warren K; Bean G; Gabbard B; Lyder CH; Bing M; McCauley C
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2005; 6(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 15894247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inter-rater agreement on assessment of outcome within a trauma registry.
    Ekegren CL; Hart MJ; Brown A; Gabbe BJ
    Injury; 2016 Jan; 47(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 26304002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tracking quality over time: what do pressure ulcer data show?
    Gunningberg L; Stotts NA
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2008 Aug; 20(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 18390902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
    Fulbrook P; Anderson A
    J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-Rater Agreement Estimates for Data With High Prevalence of a Single Response.
    Waugh SM; He J
    J Nurs Meas; 2019 Aug; 27(2):152-161. PubMed ID: 31511402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nursing home quality and pressure ulcer prevention and management practices.
    Wipke-Tevis DD; Williams DA; Rantz MJ; Popejoy LL; Madsen RW; Petroski GF; Vogelsmeier AA
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Apr; 52(4):583-8. PubMed ID: 15066075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice.
    Wang LH; Chen HL; Yan HY; Gao JH; Wang F; Ming Y; Lu L; Ding JJ
    Int Wound J; 2015 Oct; 12(5):590-4. PubMed ID: 25224688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-rater reliability of pressure ulcer staging: ordinal probit Bayesian hierarchical model that allows for uncertain rater response.
    Gajewski BJ; Hart S; Bergquist-Beringer S; Dunton N
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4602-18. PubMed ID: 17393413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of Pressure Ulcer Rates: How Precisely Can We Differentiate Among Hospital Units, and Does the Standard Signal-Noise Reliability Measure Reflect This Precision?
    Staggs VS; Cramer E
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Aug; 39(4):298-305. PubMed ID: 27223598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Neonatal Skin Risk Assessment Scale.
    García-Molina P; Balaguer López E; Verdú J; Nolasco A; García Fernández FP
    J Nurs Manag; 2018 Sep; 26(6):744-756. PubMed ID: 29656490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Pressure in nursing care: Outcomes of a prevalence study of pressure ulcers in Austrian hospitals and nursing homes].
    Grosschädl F; Lohrmann C
    Pflege Z; 2011 Jun; 64(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 21735635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heel pressure ulcer, prevention and predictors during the care delivery chain - when and where to take action? A descriptive and explorative study.
    Muntlin Athlin Å; Engström M; Gunningberg L; Bååth C
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 Nov; 24(1):134. PubMed ID: 27842564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors Associated With Pediatric Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries.
    Razmus I
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2018; 45(2):107-116. PubMed ID: 29373436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.