These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27038432)

  • 1. Enhancement of biogas production from food waste and sewage sludge - Environmental and economic life cycle performance.
    Eriksson O; Bisaillon M; Haraldsson M; Sundberg J
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():33-9. PubMed ID: 27038432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carbon capture and biogas enhancement by carbon dioxide enrichment of anaerobic digesters treating sewage sludge or food waste.
    Bajón Fernández Y; Soares A; Villa R; Vale P; Cartmell E
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 May; 159():1-7. PubMed ID: 24632434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.
    Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of microwave pre-treatment of thickened waste activated sludge on biogas production from co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, thickened waste activated sludge and municipal sludge.
    Ara E; Sartaj M; Kennedy K
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Dec; 32(12):1200-9. PubMed ID: 25398411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A proposed framework of food waste collection and recycling for renewable biogas fuel production in Hong Kong.
    Woon KS; Lo IM
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt A):3-10. PubMed ID: 25890872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal utilization of waste-to-energy in an LCA perspective.
    Fruergaard T; Astrup T
    Waste Manag; 2011 Mar; 31(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 20937557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
    Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental assessment of food waste valorization in producing biogas for various types of energy use based on LCA approach.
    Woon KS; Lo IM; Chiu SL; Yan DY
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():290-9. PubMed ID: 26923298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Converting campus waste into renewable energy - a case study for the University of Cincinnati.
    Tu Q; Zhu C; McAvoy DC
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():258-65. PubMed ID: 25697388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal food waste and sewage sludge: A comparative life cycle assessment in the context of a waste service provision.
    Edwards J; Othman M; Crossin E; Burn S
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Jan; 223():237-249. PubMed ID: 27794271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion from a trinary mix substrate over a binary mix substrate.
    Ara E; Sartaj M; Kennedy K
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Jun; 33(6):578-87. PubMed ID: 25964293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental & economic life cycle assessment of current & future sewage sludge to energy technologies.
    Mills N; Pearce P; Farrow J; Thorpe RB; Kirkby NF
    Waste Manag; 2014 Jan; 34(1):185-95. PubMed ID: 24060290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The implementation of anaerobic digestion of food waste in a highly populated urban area: an LCA evaluation.
    Grosso M; Nava C; Testori R; Rigamonti L; Viganò F
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):78-87. PubMed ID: 22993137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of greenhouse gas emission reductions from sewage sludge anaerobic digestion in China.
    Liu HT; Kong XJ; Zheng GD; Chen CC
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 26744944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reviewing the anaerobic digestion and co-digestion process of food waste from the perspectives on biogas production performance and environmental impacts.
    Chiu SLH; Lo IMC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec; 23(24):24435-24450. PubMed ID: 27380183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life cycle assessment of biomethane use in Argentina.
    Morero B; Groppelli E; Campanella EA
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Apr; 182():208-216. PubMed ID: 25700340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment.
    Styles D; Dominguez EM; Chadwick D
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():241-53. PubMed ID: 27101461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical-biological treatment: performance and potentials. An LCA of 8 MBT plants including waste characterization.
    Montejo C; Tonini D; Márquez Mdel C; Astrup TF
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():661-73. PubMed ID: 23850761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Waste Separation Press (WSP): a mechanical pretreatment option for organic waste from source separation.
    Jank A; Müller W; Schneider I; Gerke F; Bockreis A
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():71-7. PubMed ID: 25761398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.