These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27038528)

  • 1. Use of digital panoramic radiology in presurgical implant treatment planning to accurately assess bone density.
    Chugh NK; Bhattacharyya J; Das S; Ghosh S; Dutta K; Goel P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):200-205.e1. PubMed ID: 27038528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
    Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessments of jaw bone density at implant sites using 3D cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hao Y; Zhao W; Wang Y; Yu J; Zou D
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2014; 18(9):1398-403. PubMed ID: 24867520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
    Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
    Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
    J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of a multiporous beta-tricalicum phosphate on bone density around dental implants inserted into fresh extraction sockets.
    Daif ET
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 21942363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Jaw bone density assessments of implant sites using spiral CT and Simplant software].
    Li FB; Yu LY; Cai YD; Xie C
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Feb; 18(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 19290428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
    Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 34(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 17371564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry.
    Dreiseidler T; Mischkowski RA; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Zöller JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 19492636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites part 2: correlation with bone classification and primary stability.
    Ribeiro-Rotta RF; de Oliveira RC; Dias DR; Lindh C; Leles CR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e47-53. PubMed ID: 23106552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of radiographic and histological assessment of peri-implant bone around oral implants.
    Stokholm R; Spin-Neto R; Nyengaard JR; Isidor F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jul; 27(7):782-6. PubMed ID: 26407918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic evaluation of anatomical variables in maxilla and mandible in relation to dental implant placement.
    Chandra P; Govindaraju P; Chowdhary R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):344-347. PubMed ID: 27723627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study.
    Ikumi N; Tsutsumi S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 15839119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short communication: use of a diagnostic software to predict bone density and implant stability in preoperative CTs.
    Pagliani L; Motroni A; Nappo A; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):553-7. PubMed ID: 20586783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of bone density in the posterior maxilla based on Hounsfield units to enhance the initial stability of implants.
    Sogo M; Ikebe K; Yang TC; Wada M; Maeda Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e183-7. PubMed ID: 22176704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.