These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27039047)

  • 1. Characterization of the gut microbiome in epidemiologic studies: the multiethnic cohort experience.
    Fu BC; Randolph TW; Lim U; Monroe KR; Cheng I; Wilkens LR; Le Marchand L; Hullar MA; Lampe JW
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 May; 26(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 27039047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.
    Short MI; Hudson R; Besasie BD; Reveles KR; Shah DP; Nicholson S; Johnson-Pais TL; Weldon K; Lai Z; Leach RJ; Fongang B; Liss MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 33446094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
    Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
    mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool.
    Gorzelak MA; Gill SK; Tasnim N; Ahmadi-Vand Z; Jay M; Gibson DL
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134802. PubMed ID: 26252519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples.
    Fair K; Dunlap DG; Fitch A; Bogdanovich T; Methé B; Morris A; McVerry BJ; Kitsios GD
    mSphere; 2019 Jul; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31341070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient attitudes towards faecal sampling for gut microbiome studies and clinical care reveal positive engagement and room for improvement.
    Bolte LA; Klaassen MAY; Collij V; Vich Vila A; Fu J; van der Meulen TA; de Haan JJ; Versteegen GJ; Dotinga A; Zhernakova A; Wijmenga C; Weersma RK; Imhann F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249405. PubMed ID: 33831035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
    Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.
    Haran JP; Pinero JC; Zheng Y; Palma NA; Wingertzahn M
    Trials; 2021 Apr; 22(1):245. PubMed ID: 33810796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of variation in microbial community amplicon sequencing by the Microbiome Quality Control (MBQC) project consortium.
    Sinha R; Abu-Ali G; Vogtmann E; Fodor AA; Ren B; Amir A; Schwager E; Crabtree J; Ma S; ; Abnet CC; Knight R; White O; Huttenhower C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1077-1086. PubMed ID: 28967885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
    Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of stool microbiome methods for DNA yields and sequencing among infants and young children.
    Antosca K; Hoen AG; Palys T; Hilliard M; Morrison HG; Coker M; Madan J; Karagas MR
    Microbiologyopen; 2020 May; 9(5):e1018. PubMed ID: 32166902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
    Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
    J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gut microbiome analysis by post: Evaluation of the optimal method to collect stool samples from infants within a national cohort study.
    Williams GM; Leary SD; Ajami NJ; Chipper Keating S; Petrosin JF; Hamilton-Shield JP; Gillespie KM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0216557. PubMed ID: 31188837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gut microbiota, short chain fatty acids, and obesity across the epidemiologic transition: the METS-Microbiome study protocol.
    Dugas LR; Lie L; Plange-Rhule J; Bedu-Addo K; Bovet P; Lambert EV; Forrester TE; Luke A; Gilbert JA; Layden BT
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Aug; 18(1):978. PubMed ID: 30081857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
    Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
    Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
    BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The gut microbiome and type 2 diabetes status in the Multiethnic Cohort.
    Maskarinec G; Raquinio P; Kristal BS; Setiawan VW; Wilkens LR; Franke AA; Lim U; Le Marchand L; Randolph TW; Lampe JW; Hullar MAJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0250855. PubMed ID: 34161346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
    Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
    BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gut microbiome comparability of fresh-frozen versus stabilized-frozen samples from hospitalized patients using 16S rRNA gene and shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
    Ilett EE; Jørgensen M; Noguera-Julian M; Daugaard G; Murray DD; Helleberg M; Paredes R; Lundgren J; Sengeløv H; MacPherson C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13351. PubMed ID: 31527823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method Validation for Extraction of DNA from Human Stool Samples for Downstream Microbiome Analysis.
    Neuberger-Castillo L; Hamot G; Marchese M; Sanchez I; Ammerlaan W; Betsou F
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Apr; 18(2):102-116. PubMed ID: 31999474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.