These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. History of cochlear implants. Albernaz PL Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(2):124-5. PubMed ID: 25681092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The past, present, and future of cochlear prostheses. Spelman FA IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999; 18(3):27-33. PubMed ID: 10337561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The evolution of cochlear implant technology and its clinical relevance. Hainarosie M; Zainea V; Hainarosie R J Med Life; 2014; 7 Spec No. 2(Spec Iss 2):1-4. PubMed ID: 25870662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The history of cochlear implantation: from Volta to multichannel-intracochlear stimulation]. Jaekel K; Richter B; Laszig R Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Sep; 81(9):649-58. PubMed ID: 12357414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Historical evolution of cochlear implants--from Volta to multichannel intracochlear stimulation]. Feldmann H Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Dec; 81(12):910-1; author reply 911. PubMed ID: 12557841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recognizing the journey and celebrating the achievement of cochlear implants. Zeng FG; Canlon B Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():1-3. PubMed ID: 25819292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [From Aristotle to the cochlear implant. A contribution to the history of hearing disorders]. Pfaltz CR Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):616-8. PubMed ID: 8273020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Usami S-I et al. - Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries. Acta Oto-Laryngol 2014; 134: 717-727. Hellström S Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Mar; 138(3):317-328. PubMed ID: 29532722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The story of one invention--the paper about rehabilitation of deafness]. Latkowski B Otolaryngol Pol; 2001; 55(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 11766325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addendum to the history of cochlear implants in Brazil. Bento RF Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(5):576. PubMed ID: 26277831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochlear and brainstem implantation. 2002. Toh EH; Luxford WM Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2008 Apr; 19(2):317-29, vii. PubMed ID: 18534342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cochlear implantation: past and present. Desloovere C Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1998; 52(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 9651608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of cochlear implant history. Niparko JK JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 May; 139(5):454. PubMed ID: 23681027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Early UCSF contributions to the development of multiple-channel cochlear implants. Merzenich MM Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():39-46. PubMed ID: 25560478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Rehabilitation of hearing-impaired patients with cochlear implants: a review]. Gstoettner W; Adunka O; Hamzavi J; Baumgartner WD Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):464-72. PubMed ID: 10890122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosthetic stimulation of the auditory system with intraneural electrodes. Arts HA; Jones DA; Anderson DJ Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2003 Sep; 191():20-5. PubMed ID: 14533840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evolving science of cochlear implants. Clark GM; Clark JC; Furness JB JAMA; 2013 Sep; 310(12):1225-6. PubMed ID: 24018758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]