156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27039791)
21. The pathologist in breast cancer: contemporary issues in the interdisciplinary approach.
Ibarra JA
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Apr; 9(2):295-317. PubMed ID: 10757846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pathology reporting of breast cancer: trends in 1989-1999, following the introduction of mammographic screening in Western Australia.
Harvey JM; Sterrett GF; McEvoy S; Fritschi L; Jamrozik K; Ingram D; Joseph D; Dewar J; Byrne MJ;
Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):341-6. PubMed ID: 16194843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Novel diagnostic procedure for determining metastasis to sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer using a semi-dry dot-blot method.
Otsubo R; Oikawa M; Hirakawa H; Shibata K; Abe K; Hayashi T; Kinoshita N; Shigematsu K; Hatachi T; Yano H; Matsumoto M; Takagi K; Tsuchiya T; Tomoshige K; Nakashima M; Taniguchi H; Omagari T; Itoyanagi N; Nagayasu T
Int J Cancer; 2014 Feb; 134(4):905-12. PubMed ID: 23913465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Grading of tumors in the tubular digestive tract : Esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum].
Bläker H
Pathologe; 2016 Jul; 37(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 27255228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Standards, options and recommendations for the composition of anatomic and surgical pathology reports or cytopathology reports in oncology].
Arnould L; Fiche M; Blanc-Vincent MP; Le Doussal V; Signal-Zafrani B; Gory-Delaboere G; Briffod M; Vielh P; Voigt JJ;
Ann Pathol; 2003 Feb; 23(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 12743509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical application of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging, treatment and prognosis of colon and gastric cancer.
Dragan R; Nebojsa M; Dejan S; Ivan P; Dragos S; Damir J; Predrag S; Vladan Z
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(96):1606-11. PubMed ID: 20214202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Breast cancer pathology.
Lee CS
Pathology; 2005 Oct; 37(5):339-40. PubMed ID: 16194842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast pathology review: does it make a difference?
Romanoff AM; Cohen A; Schmidt H; Weltz CR; Jaffer SM; Nagi CS; Bleiweiss IJ; Port ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3504-8. PubMed ID: 24859936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Srigley J; Grignon D; Humphrey P;
Hum Pathol; 2007 Sep; 38(9):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17707261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nongenital cancers metastatic to the ovary.
Petru E; Pickel H; Heydarfadai M; Lahousen M; Haas J; Schaider H; Tamussino K
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Jan; 44(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 1730431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What impact has the introduction of a synoptic report for rectal cancer had on reporting outcomes for specialist gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal pathologists?
Messenger DE; McLeod RS; Kirsch R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1471-5. PubMed ID: 22032575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Improving the quality of surgical pathology reports for breast cancer: a centralized audit with feedback.
Onerheim R; Racette P; Jacques A; Gagnon R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Sep; 132(9):1428-31. PubMed ID: 18788854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 8629896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Electronic capture and communication of synoptic cancer data elements from pathology reports: results of the Reporting Pathology Protocols 2 (RPP2) project.
Hassell L; Aldinger W; Moody C; Winters S; Gerlach K; Schwenn M; Perriello D
J Registry Manag; 2009; 36(4):117-24; quiz 163-5. PubMed ID: 20795553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Variation in breast cancer grading: the effect of creating awareness through laboratory-specific and pathologist-specific feedback reports in 16 734 patients with breast cancer.
van Dooijeweert C; van Diest PJ; Baas IO; van der Wall E; Deckers IA
J Clin Pathol; 2020 Dec; 73(12):793-799. PubMed ID: 32276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Synoptic reporting in tumor pathology: advantages of a web-based system.
Qu Z; Ninan S; Almosa A; Chang KG; Kuruvilla S; Nguyen N
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 17509987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recommendations for the reporting of resected large intestinal carcinomas. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.
Mod Pathol; 1996 Jan; 9(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 8821961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Histopathology reporting of breast cancer in Queensland: the impact on the quality of reporting as a result of the introduction of recommendations.
Austin R; Thompson B; Coory M; Walpole E; Francis G; Fritschi L
Pathology; 2009; 41(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 19404849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
