These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27040222)

  • 1. Finite element analysis on influence of implant surface treatments, connection and bone types.
    Santiago Junior JF; Verri FR; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Jun; 63():292-300. PubMed ID: 27040222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis.
    Pellizzer EP; Lemos CAA; Almeida DAF; de Souza Batista VE; Santiago Júnior JF; Verri FR
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2018 Sep; 90():645-650. PubMed ID: 29853134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Varying Diameter and Connection Type in Implants with High Crown-Implant Ratio.
    Moraes SLD; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Lemos CAA; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 29267522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
    de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
    J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention System and Splinting on Morse Taper Implants in the Posterior Maxilla by 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DAF; Batista VES; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer DP
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29267521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
    Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 3-D finite element study of the influence of crown-implant ratio on stress distribution.
    de Moraes SL; Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 24474362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Single Implant-Supported Prostheses in the Anterior Maxilla, with Different Surgical Techniques and Implant Types.
    Verri FR; Santiago JF; Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Araujo Lemos CA; Mello CC; Pellizzer EP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):e191-e198. PubMed ID: 28708909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: analysis by 3-dimensional finite element method.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; de Moraes SL; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 21463183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of parafunctional loading and prosthetic connection on stress distribution: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Torcato LB; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Santiago Júnior JF; de Faria Almeida DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 26187105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress distribution over internal hexagon short implant: 3-D finite element analysis with statistical test.
    Ramos Verri F; Santiago Junior JF; de Faria Almeida DA; de Oliveira GB; de Souza Batista VE; Marques Honório H; Noritomi PY; Pellizzer EP
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 25435384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of implant/abutment connection on stress distribution to implant-surrounding bone: a finite element analysis.
    Hanaoka M; Gehrke SA; Mardegan F; Gennari CR; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M; Corbella S
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):565-71. PubMed ID: 24750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of bicortical techniques in internal connection placed in premaxillary area by 3D finite element analysis.
    Verri FR; Cruz RS; Lemos CA; de Souza Batista VE; Almeida DA; Verri AC; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 27409042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different types of prosthetic platforms on stress-distribution in dental implant-supported prostheses.
    Minatel L; Verri FR; Kudo GAH; de Faria Almeida DA; de Souza Batista VE; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP; Santiago JF
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Feb; 71():35-42. PubMed ID: 27987717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
    Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.