These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27040359)

  • 1. Current patient and healthcare worker attitudes to eHealth and the personally controlled electronic health record in major hospitals.
    Armani R; Mitchell LE; Allen-Graham J; Heriot NR; Kotsimbos T; Wilson JW
    Intern Med J; 2016 Jun; 46(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 27040359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
    Andrews L; Gajanayake R; Sahama T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):889-900. PubMed ID: 25200198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pilot study on the views of elderly regional Australians of personally controlled electronic health records.
    Kerai P; Wood P; Martin M
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 24382474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Knowledge and attitudes regarding the personally controlled electronic health record: an Australian national survey.
    Lehnbom EC; Brien JE; McLachlan AJ
    Intern Med J; 2014 Apr; 44(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 24754689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes of pregnant women towards personally controlled electronic, hospital-held, and patient-held medical record systems: a survey study.
    Quinlivan JA; Lyons S; Petersen RW
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Sep; 20(9):810-5. PubMed ID: 25046543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive beliefs and privacy concerns shape the future for the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record.
    Lehnbom EC; Douglas HE; Makeham MA
    Intern Med J; 2016 Jan; 46(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 26813902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A qualitative study of Australians' opinions about personally controlled electronic health records.
    Lehnbom EC; McLachlan A; Brien JA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():105-10. PubMed ID: 22797027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic health records and online medical records: an asset or a liability under current conditions?
    Allen-Graham J; Mitchell L; Heriot N; Armani R; Langton D; Levinson M; Young A; Smith JA; Kotsimbos T; Wilson JW
    Aust Health Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 28104042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient perspectives on a personally controlled electronic health record used in regional Australia.
    Hanna L; Gill SD; Newstead L; Hawkins M; Osborne RH
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Jan; 46(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 27486184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demographic characteristics of Australian health consumers who were early registrants for opt-in personally controlled electronic health records.
    Torrens E; Walker SM
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):127-133. PubMed ID: 28537210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. eHealth-as-a-Service (eHaaS): a data-driven decision making approach in Australian context.
    Black A; Sahama T; Gajanayake R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():915-9. PubMed ID: 25160321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A personally controlled electronic health record for Australia.
    Pearce C; Bainbridge M
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 24650635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
    Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) for Adults with Severe Communication Impairments: Findings of Pilot Research.
    Hemsley B; Georgiou A; Balandin S; Carter R; Hill S; Higgins I; Van Vliet P; McCarthy S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 214():100-6. PubMed ID: 26210425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of local support for the adoption of a national programme--a descriptive study.
    Pearce C; Bartlett J; Mcleod A; Eustace P; Amos R; Shearer M
    Inform Prim Care; 2014; 21(4):171-8. PubMed ID: 25479347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A patient centered electronic health: eHealth system development.
    Schiza EC; Neokleous KC; Petkov N; Schizas CN
    Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(4):509-22. PubMed ID: 26409913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knowledge and attitudes of nurses in community health centres about electronic medical records.
    O'Mahony D; Wright G; Yogeswaran P; Govere F
    Curationis; 2014 Feb; 37(1):1150. PubMed ID: 24832678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tribes and tribulations: interdisciplinary eHealth in providing services for people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI).
    Hines M; Brunner M; Poon S; Lam M; Tran V; Yu D; Togher L; Shaw T; Power E
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Nov; 17(1):757. PubMed ID: 29162086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Australia's personally controlled electronic health record and primary healthcare: generating a framework for implementation and evaluation.
    Almond H; Cummings E; Turner P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 188():1-6. PubMed ID: 23823280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Realist review to inform development of the electronic advance care plan for the personally controlled electronic health record in Australia.
    Skinner I; Smith C; Jaffray L
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Nov; 20(11):1042-8. PubMed ID: 25290057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.