339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27040452)
1. Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape-scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species.
Ikin K; Tulloch A; Gibbons P; Ansell D; Seddon J; Lindenmayer D
Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1027-37. PubMed ID: 27040452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revegetation and reproduction: do restoration plantings in agricultural landscapes support breeding populations of woodland birds?
Belder DJ; Pierson JC; Ikin K; Lindenmayer DB
Oecologia; 2020 Apr; 192(4):865-878. PubMed ID: 32025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.
Larson ER; Howell S; Kareiva P; Armsworth PR
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):206-15. PubMed ID: 26460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Water availability drives aboveground biomass and bird richness in forest restoration plantings to achieve carbon and biodiversity cobenefits.
Hagger V; Wilson K; England JR; Dwyer JM
Ecol Evol; 2019 Dec; 9(24):14379-14393. PubMed ID: 31938526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bird-community responses to habitat creation in a long-term, large-scale natural experiment.
Whytock RC; Fuentes-Montemayor E; Watts K; Barbosa De Andrade P; Whytock RT; French P; Macgregor NA; Park KJ
Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 28685859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas.
Di Marco M; Brooks T; Cuttelod A; Fishpool LD; Rondinini C; Smith RJ; Bennun L; Butchart SH; Ferrier S; Foppen RP; Joppa L; Juffe-Bignoli D; Knight AT; Lamoreux JF; Langhammer PF; May I; Possingham HP; Visconti P; Watson JE; Woodley S
Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):392-402. PubMed ID: 26307601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revegetation in agricultural areas: the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity.
Munro NT; Fischer J; Wood J; Lindenmayer DB
Ecol Appl; 2009 Jul; 19(5):1197-210. PubMed ID: 19688927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving effectiveness of systematic conservation planning with density data.
Veloz S; Salas L; Altman B; Alexander J; Jongsomjit D; Elliott N; Ballard G
Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 25873240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using empirical models of species colonization under multiple threatening processes to identify complementary threat-mitigation strategies.
Tulloch AI; Mortelliti A; Kay GM; Florance D; Lindenmayer D
Conserv Biol; 2016 Aug; 30(4):867-82. PubMed ID: 26711716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weather effects on birds of different size are mediated by long-term climate and vegetation type in endangered temperate woodlands.
Lindenmayer DB; Lane P; Crane M; Florance D; Foster CN; Ikin K; Michael D; Sato CF; Scheele BC; Westgate MJ
Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Feb; 25(2):675-685. PubMed ID: 30431211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. At the Crossroads: Does the Configuration of Roadside Vegetation Affect Woodland Bird Communities in Rural Landscapes?
Hall M; Nimmo D; Bennett AF
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155219. PubMed ID: 27183227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The combined effects of remnant vegetation and tree planting on farmland birds.
Cunningham RB; Lindenmayer DB; Crane M; Michael D; MacGregor C; Montague-Drake R; Fischer J
Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 18477028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country.
Tobón W; Urquiza-Haas T; Koleff P; Schröter M; Ortega-Álvarez R; Campo J; Lindig-Cisneros R; Sarukhán J; Bonn A
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1086-1097. PubMed ID: 28233917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.
Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31206826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use.
Robillard CM; Kerr JT
Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):837-847. PubMed ID: 27991681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Birds in agricultural mosaics: the influence of landscape pattern and countryside heterogeneity.
Haslem A; Bennett AF
Ecol Appl; 2008 Jan; 18(1):185-96. PubMed ID: 18372565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using abiotic variables to predict importance of sites for species representation.
Albuquerque F; Beier P
Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1390-400. PubMed ID: 25959590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting landscape-scale biodiversity recovery by natural tropical forest regrowth.
Prieto PV; Bukoski JJ; Barros FSM; Beyer HL; Iribarrem A; Brancalion PHS; Chazdon RL; Lindenmayer DB; Strassburg BBN; Guariguata MR; Crouzeilles R
Conserv Biol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):e13842. PubMed ID: 34705299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial, socio-economic, and ecological implications of incorporating minimum size constraints in marine protected area network design.
Metcalfe K; Vaughan G; Vaz S; Smith RJ
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1615-25. PubMed ID: 26219669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An empirical assessment of the focal species hypothesis.
Lindenmayer DB; Lane PW; Westgate MJ; Crane M; Michael D; Okada S; Barton PS
Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1594-603. PubMed ID: 25048948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
