These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27040452)

  • 21. Microtargeting for conservation.
    Metcalf AL; Phelan CN; Pallai C; Norton M; Yuhas B; Finley JC; Muth A
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1141-1150. PubMed ID: 30887584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Value of protected areas to avian persistence across 20 years of climate and land-use change.
    Peach MA; Cohen JB; Frair JL; Zuckerberg B; Sullivan P; Porter WF; Lang C
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):423-433. PubMed ID: 30113109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of planning for connectivity on linear reserve networks.
    Lentini PE; Gibbons P; Carwardine J; Fischer J; Drielsma M; Martin TG
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):796-807. PubMed ID: 23647073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Scaling up private land conservation to meet recovery goals for grassland birds.
    Pavlacky DC; Hagen CA; Bartuszevige AM; Iovanna R; George TL; Naugle DE
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Oct; 35(5):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 33728682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Benefits to poorly studied taxa of conservation of bird and mammal diversity on islands.
    Aslan C; Holmes N; Tershy B; Spatz D; Croll DA
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 25065901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prioritizing global tall forests toward the 30 × 30 goals.
    Huang Q; Xu J; Wong JP; Radeloff VC; Songer M
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Dec; 37(6):e14135. PubMed ID: 37377172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ongoing declines of woodland birds: Are restoration plantings making a difference?
    Belder DJ; Pierson JC; Rudder AC; Lindenmayer DB
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e2268. PubMed ID: 33237571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multi-scale associations between vegetation cover and woodland bird communities across a large agricultural region.
    Ikin K; Barton PS; Stirnemann IA; Stein JR; Michael D; Crane M; Okada S; Lindenmayer DB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97029. PubMed ID: 24830684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Slow recovery of tropical old-field rainforest regrowth and the value and limitations of active restoration.
    Shoo LP; Freebody K; Kanowski J; Catterall CP
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 26310383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Phylodiversity to inform conservation policy: An Australian example.
    Laity T; Laffan SW; González-Orozco CE; Faith DP; Rosauer DF; Byrne M; Miller JT; Crayn D; Costion C; Moritz CC; Newport K
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Nov; 534():131-43. PubMed ID: 25976346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Carbon payments and low-cost conservation.
    Crossman ND; Bryan BA; Summers DM
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):835-45. PubMed ID: 21507060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning.
    Nielsen ES; Beger M; Henriques R; Selkoe KA; von der Heyden S
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):872-882. PubMed ID: 27925351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cross-sectional and temporal relationships between bird occupancy and vegetation cover at multiple spatial scales.
    Cunningham R; Lindenmayer D; Barton P; Ikin K; Crane M; Michael D; Okada S; Gibbons P; Stein J
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1275-88. PubMed ID: 29160651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
    Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Offsets and conservation of the species of the EU habitats and birds directives.
    Regnery B; Couvet D; Kerbiriou C
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1335-43. PubMed ID: 24033535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Environmental diversity as a surrogate for species representation.
    Beier P; de Albuquerque FS
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 25864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Representation of critical natural capital in China.
    Lü Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Fu B; Whitham C; Liu S; Wu B
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 28218967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effectiveness of surrogate taxa for the representation of biodiversity.
    Lewandowski AS; Noss RF; Parsons DR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1367-77. PubMed ID: 20455907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.