These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27040784)

  • 21. Short communication: genomic evaluations of final score for US Holsteins benefit from the inclusion of genotypes on cows.
    Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3332-5. PubMed ID: 23477821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting the exchange of genetic material between Nordic and US Holstein populations.
    Buch LH; Sørensen AC; Lassen J; Berg P; Christensen LG; Sørensen MK
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Aug; 92(8):4023-34. PubMed ID: 19620686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
    Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices.
    Zhou L; Lund MS; Wang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Aug; 131(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 24750283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of genomic prediction when combining two related crossbred populations.
    Vallée A; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4342-8. PubMed ID: 25149337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
    Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values in Danish Jersey.
    Thomasen JR; Guldbrandtsen B; Su G; Brøndum RF; Lund MS
    Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 22558926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short communication: Use of young bulls in the United States.
    Hutchison JL; Cole JB; Bickhart DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):3213-20. PubMed ID: 24612804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.
    Habier D; Tetens J; Seefried FR; Lichtner P; Thaller G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Feb; 42(1):5. PubMed ID: 20170500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.
    Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 26805987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accounting for genomic pre-selection in national BLUP evaluations in dairy cattle.
    Patry C; Ducrocq V
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Aug; 43(1):30. PubMed ID: 21851619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genotype by environment interaction for Holstein cattle populations using autoregressive and within- and across-country multi-trait reaction norms test-day models.
    Silva DA; Lopes PS; Costa CN; Silva AA; Silva HT; Silva FF; Veroneze R; Thompson G; Carvalheira J
    Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100084. PubMed ID: 33712214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
    Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.
    Gao H; Christensen OF; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):8. PubMed ID: 22455934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of breeding values in small genotyped populations using different sources of external information-A simulation study.
    Andonov S; Lourenco DAL; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Pocrnic I; Tsuruta S; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):395-401. PubMed ID: 28341049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Gunia M; Saintilan R; Venot E; Hozé C; Fouilloux MN; Phocas F
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3258-69. PubMed ID: 24948648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.