BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27041006)

  • 1. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in inlay-restored mandibular first molar under simultaneous thermomechanical loads.
    Çelik Köycü B; Imirzalioğlu P; Özden UA
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 27041006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method.
    Çelik Köycü B; İmirzalıoğlu P
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The finite element analysis of stress distribution in different size of MO cavities restored with composite resin inlays].
    Zhang L; Lu Y; Yang BS; Guo Y; Li FP
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Apr; 24(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 25938145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis.
    Yamanel K; Caglar A; Gülsahi K; Ozden UA
    Dent Mater J; 2009 Nov; 28(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 20019416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of material and loading location on stress distribution of inlays.
    Costa VCD; Machado AC; Soares PV; Raposo LH; Vasconcellos AB
    Am J Dent; 2021 Jun; 34(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 34143589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual prototyping of adhesively restored, endodontically treated molars.
    Magne P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):343-51. PubMed ID: 20493323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue behavior and stress distribution of molars restored with MOD inlays with and without deep margin elevation.
    Grassi EDA; de Andrade GS; Tribst JPM; Machry RV; Valandro LF; Ramos NC; Bresciani E; Saavedra GSFA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2513-2526. PubMed ID: 34643807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cyclic thermal stress on the fatigue life of teeth restored with gold inlay.
    Han W; Kim JH; Kwon HB; Park JK; Seo DG
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Jul; 41(4):567-572. PubMed ID: 35370259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of ceramic thickness and composite bases on stress distribution of inlays--a finite element analysis.
    Durand LB; Guimarães JC; Monteiro Junior S; Baratieri LN
    Braz Dent J; 2015; 26(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 25831105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations.
    van den Breemer CRG; Özcan M; Cune MS; van der Giezen R; Kerdijk W; Gresnigt MMM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Aug; 72():102-109. PubMed ID: 28477520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
    Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.