216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2704114)
1. Editors and auditors.
Rennie D
JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.
Woolf PK
JAMA; 1987 Dec; 258(23):3424-7. PubMed ID: 3682141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thyroid storm.
Rennie D
JAMA; 1997 Apr; 277(15):1238-43. PubMed ID: 9103350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraudulent research in science: the responsibility of the peer reviewer.
MacDermott RP
Cancer Invest; 1991; 9(6):703-5. PubMed ID: 1747796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.
Yankauer A
Am J Public Health; 1990 Apr; 80(4):399-400. PubMed ID: 2316756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient consent for publication and the health of the public.
Snider DE
JAMA; 1997 Aug; 278(8):624-6. PubMed ID: 9272883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrity of research papers questioned.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1987 Jan; 235(4787):422-3. PubMed ID: 3798118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent for publication.
Fontanarosa PB; Glass RM
JAMA; 1997 Aug; 278(8):682-3. PubMed ID: 9272905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud in biomedical science.
Satyanarayana K
Natl Med J India; 1992; 5(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 1304290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Should camp-followers be policemen?
Maddox J
Nature; 1990 Nov; 348(6297):107. PubMed ID: 1978252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accountability, audit, and reverence for the publication process.
Rennie D
JAMA; 1993 Jul; 270(4):495-6. PubMed ID: 8320791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fraud in science.
Altman L; Melcher L
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jun; 286(6383):2003-6. PubMed ID: 6409204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conflicts of interest in the publication of science.
Rennie D; Flanagin A; Glass RM
JAMA; 1991 Jul; 266(2):266-7. PubMed ID: 2056630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of data audits in detecting scientific misconduct.
JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 2192092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
