BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2704114)

  • 21. Peer review comes under peer review.
    Sun M
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4907):910-2. PubMed ID: 2727683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Dingell probe finally goes public.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 May; 244(4905):643, 645-6. PubMed ID: 2655086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A view of misconduct in science.
    Racker E
    Nature; 1989 May; 339(6220):91-3. PubMed ID: 2716839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The efficacy of generic primidone.
    JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2499-500. PubMed ID: 2704103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Cantekin affair.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3333-7. PubMed ID: 1960835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pushing drugs to doctors.
    Consum Rep; 1992 Feb; 57(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 11651202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pitching doctors.
    Wilkes MS; Shuchman M
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Nov; ():88, 90, 126, 128-129. PubMed ID: 11650264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Science comes to terms with the lessons of fraud.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1999 Mar; 398(6722):13-7. PubMed ID: 10078516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The toxicity/safety of processed free glutamic acid (MSG): a study in suppression of information.
    Samuels A
    Account Res; 1999; 6(4):259-310. PubMed ID: 11657840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Editors' responsibility in defeating fraud.
    Meguid MM
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):13. PubMed ID: 10331380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A last call for self-regulation of biomedical research.
    Friedman PJ
    Acad Med; 1989 Sep; 64(9):502-4. PubMed ID: 2765058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dingell v. Baltimore.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Apr; 244(4903):412-4. PubMed ID: 2655079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. FDA issues concerning conflicts of interest.
    Kurt TL
    IRB; 1990; 12(5):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Responding to scientific misconduct. Due process and prevention.
    Mishkin B
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1932-6. PubMed ID: 3418855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Article brings censure recommendation.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1987 Sep; 258(9):1137. PubMed ID: 3306007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Global trend: more science, more fraud.
    Altman L; Broad WJ
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
    Herch F; Flower R
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reducing publication bias in biomedical research: reviewing and registering protocol with a suitable journal.
    Rezaeian M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():248-9. PubMed ID: 26051243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.