These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27041781)

  • 21. Primary and multisensory cortical activity is correlated with audiovisual percepts.
    Benoit MM; Raij T; Lin FH; Jääskeläinen IP; Stufflebeam S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Apr; 31(4):526-38. PubMed ID: 19780040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Face-viewing patterns predict audiovisual speech integration in autistic children.
    Feng S; Lu H; Wang Q; Li T; Fang J; Chen L; Yi L
    Autism Res; 2021 Dec; 14(12):2592-2602. PubMed ID: 34415113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Musical Expertise Affects Audiovisual Speech Perception: Findings From Event-Related Potentials and Inter-trial Phase Coherence.
    Sorati M; Behne DM
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2562. PubMed ID: 31803107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rapid recalibration of speech perception after experiencing the McGurk illusion.
    Lüttke CS; Pérez-Bellido A; de Lange FP
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Mar; 5(3):170909. PubMed ID: 29657743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Neural Correlates of Modality-Sensitive Deviance Detection in the Audiovisual Oddball Paradigm.
    Randazzo M; Priefer R; Smith PJ; Nagler A; Avery T; Froud K
    Brain Sci; 2020 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32481538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electrophysiological Indices of Audiovisual Speech Perception: Beyond the McGurk Effect and Speech in Noise.
    Irwin J; Avery T; Brancazio L; Turcios J; Ryherd K; Landi N
    Multisens Res; 2018 Jan; 31(1-2):39-56. PubMed ID: 31264595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tri-modal speech: Audio-visual-tactile integration in speech perception.
    Derrick D; Hansmann D; Theys C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3495. PubMed ID: 31795693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction across sensory modalities: A neurocomputational model of the McGurk effect.
    Olasagasti I; Bouton S; Giraud AL
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():61-75. PubMed ID: 26009260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory.
    Colin C; Radeau M; Soquet A; Demolin D; Colin F; Deltenre P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Apr; 113(4):495-506. PubMed ID: 11955994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age-related hearing loss influences functional connectivity of auditory cortex for the McGurk illusion.
    Rosemann S; Smith D; Dewenter M; Thiel CM
    Cortex; 2020 Aug; 129():266-280. PubMed ID: 32535378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.
    Getz LM; Toscano JC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2583-2598. PubMed ID: 33884572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual-tactile integration in speech perception: Evidence for modality neutral speech primitives.
    Bicevskis K; Derrick D; Gick B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3531. PubMed ID: 27908052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring audiovisual speech perception in monolingual and bilingual children in Uzbekistan.
    Nematova S; Zinszer B; Jasinska KK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2024 Mar; 239():105808. PubMed ID: 37972516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.
    Eskelund K; Tuomainen J; Andersen TS
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 21188364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of attentional load on audiovisual speech perception: evidence from ERPs.
    Alsius A; Möttönen R; Sams ME; Soto-Faraco S; Tiippana K
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():727. PubMed ID: 25076922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Atypical audiovisual speech integration in infants at risk for autism.
    Guiraud JA; Tomalski P; Kushnerenko E; Ribeiro H; Davies K; Charman T; Elsabbagh M; Johnson MH;
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36428. PubMed ID: 22615768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audio-visual onset differences are used to determine syllable identity for ambiguous audio-visual stimulus pairs.
    Ten Oever S; Sack AT; Wheat KL; Bien N; van Atteveldt N
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():331. PubMed ID: 23805110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.