These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2704188)

  • 1. Frequency discrimination ability and stop-consonant identification in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Ochs MT; Humes LE; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 2704188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64. PubMed ID: 2921418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perceptual weighting of relative amplitude and formant transition cues in aided CV syllables.
    Hedrick M; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Oct; 44(5):964-74. PubMed ID: 11708536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Ellison DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54. PubMed ID: 2921417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Formant transition duration and speech recognition in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Smith SJ; Aldridge PL; Stewart SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2822-5. PubMed ID: 9165736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of synthetic /bdg/ by hearing-impaired listeners under monotic and dichotic formant presentation.
    Van de Grift Turek S; Dorman MF; Franks JR; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):1031-40. PubMed ID: 7358910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of short-term spectral cues for stop consonant place by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Van Tasell DJ; Hagen LT; Koblas LL; Penner SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Dec; 72(6):1771-80. PubMed ID: 7153424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of synthetic, voiced stop-consonants by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Raz I; Noffsinger D
    Audiology; 1985; 24(6):437-48. PubMed ID: 4084116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification and discrimination of a synthesized voicing contrast by normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired children.
    Parady S; Dorman MF; Whaley P; Raphael LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 7240559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency glide discrimination in the F2 region by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3825-32. PubMed ID: 7790660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of a single-channel wide dynamic range compression circuit on perception of stop consonant place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS; Rice T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1174-84. PubMed ID: 11063239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human frequency-following responses: representation of second formant transitions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Plyler PN; Ananthanarayan AK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001; 12(10):523-33. PubMed ID: 11791939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cues for perception of the diphthong /aI/ in either noise or reverberation. Part I. Duration of the transition.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Crowley H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2681-93. PubMed ID: 8207141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consonant similarity judgments by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Schwartz DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Mar; 23(1):162-84. PubMed ID: 7442174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.