These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2704201)

  • 1. The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution.
    Turner CW; Henn CC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Mar; 32(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 2704201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensorineural hearing loss and the discrimination of vowel-like stimuli.
    Turner CW; Van Tasell DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):562-5. PubMed ID: 6699294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of reduced audible bandwidth on asynchronous double-vowel identification.
    Valentine S; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1750-64. PubMed ID: 22615479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW; Behrens A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16158665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vowel identification and vowel masking patterns of hearing-impaired subjects.
    Van Tasell DJ; Fabry DA; Thibodeau LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 May; 81(5):1586-97. PubMed ID: 3584696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
    Arehart KH; King CA; McLean-Mudgett KS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
    Nogaki G; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
    Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1236-49. PubMed ID: 3198862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies.
    Meddis R; Hewitt MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):233-45. PubMed ID: 1737874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
    Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The intelligibility of speech with "holes" in the spectrum.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC; Dorman M; Spahr T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1102-11. PubMed ID: 12243158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1889-900. PubMed ID: 10089611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.