These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27042587)

  • 1. Dimensional Accuracy of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic VPS Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques - An Invitro Study.
    Basapogu S; Pilla A; Pathipaka S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Feb; 10(2):ZC56-9. PubMed ID: 27042587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Detail Reproduction of Four Hydrophilic Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Materials Tested Under Dry, Moist, and Wet Conditions-An In Vitro Study.
    Nagrath R; Lahori M; Agrawal M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Dec; 14(Suppl 1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26199493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
    Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Detail Reproduction and Dimensional Stability of Poly Ether, Vinyl Siloxane, and Vinyl Siloxane Ether Impression Materials: An
    Rose S; Aravindakshan S; Mohamed Usman JA; Mohamed R; Menon S; Shafiullah RS; Salloum MG
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S851-S856. PubMed ID: 34447214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
    Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Study of Dimensional Stability and Detail Reproduction of Reformulated and Nonreformulated Elastomeric Impression Materials.
    Aivatzidou K; Kamalakidis SN; Emmanouil I; Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):345-350. PubMed ID: 32875682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.
    Dugal R; Railkar B; Musani S
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 5(5):85-94. PubMed ID: 24324310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of surface detail reproduction, dimensional stability and gypsum compatibility of monophase polyvinyl-siloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials under dry and moist conditions.
    Vadapalli SB; Atluri K; Putcha MS; Kondreddi S; Kumar NS; Tadi DP
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2016; 6(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 27583217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved water absorption behaviour of experimental hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials incorporating a crosslinking agent and a novel surfactant.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2021 Jun; 37(6):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 33888340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material.
    Stober T; Johnson GH; Schmitter M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 20362766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dimensional accuracy of stone casts made from silicone-based impression materials and three impression techniques.
    Vitti RP; da Silva MA; Consani RL; Sinhoreti MA
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 24474292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials incorporating a novel surfactant compared with commercial VPS.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Tomlins P; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Aug; 33(8):e301-e309. PubMed ID: 28535951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
    Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.