377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27042817)
1. Dynamically scaled phantom phase contrast MRI compared to true-scale computational modeling of coronary artery flow.
Beier S; Ormiston JA; Webster MW; Cater JE; Norris SE; Medrano-Gracia P; Young AA; Cowan BR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Oct; 44(4):983-92. PubMed ID: 27042817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overcoming spatio-temporal limitations using dynamically scaled in vitro PC-MRI - A flow field comparison to true-scale computer simulations of idealized, stented and patient-specific left main bifurcations.
Beier S; Ormiston J; Webster M; Cater J; Norris S; Medrano-Gracia P; Young A; Gilbert K; Cowan B
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():1220-1223. PubMed ID: 28324943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements.
Rayz VL; Boussel L; Acevedo-Bolton G; Martin AJ; Young WL; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Saloner D
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051011. PubMed ID: 19045518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS
NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics.
van Ooij P; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; van Bavel E; Nederveen AJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2013 Sep; 34(9):1785-91. PubMed ID: 23598829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Towards validating stent induced micro flow patterns in left main coronary artery bifurcations.
Masoud-Ansari S; Ormiston J; Webster M; Pontre B; Cowan B; Beier S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5749-5752. PubMed ID: 31947158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accelerated dual-venc 4D flow MRI for neurovascular applications.
Schnell S; Ansari SA; Wu C; Garcia J; Murphy IG; Rahman OA; Rahsepar AA; Aristova M; Collins JD; Carr JC; Markl M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):102-114. PubMed ID: 28152256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom.
Zhao SZ; Papathanasopoulou P; Long Q; Marshall I; Xu XY
Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 31(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12918911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics.
Isoda H; Ohkura Y; Kosugi T; Hirano M; Alley MT; Bammer R; Pelc NJ; Namba H; Sakahara H
Neuroradiology; 2010 Oct; 52(10):913-20. PubMed ID: 19967532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wall shear stress estimated with phase contrast MRI in an in vitro and in vivo intracranial aneurysm.
van Ooij P; Potters WV; Guédon A; Schneiders JJ; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; vanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 38(4):876-84. PubMed ID: 23417769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive measurement of pressure gradient across a coronary stenosis using phase contrast (PC)-MRI: A feasibility study.
Deng Z; Fan Z; Lee SE; Nguyen C; Xie Y; Pang J; Bi X; Yang Q; Choi BW; Kim JS; Berman D; Chang HJ; Li D
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Feb; 77(2):529-537. PubMed ID: 28019028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shared velocity encoding: a method to improve the temporal resolution of phase-contrast velocity measurements.
Lin HY; Bender JA; Ding Y; Chung YC; Hinton AM; Pennell ML; Whitehead KK; Raman SV; Simonetti OP
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Sep; 68(3):703-10. PubMed ID: 22139889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Convex gradient optimization for increased spatiotemporal resolution and improved accuracy in phase contrast MRI.
Middione MJ; Wu HH; Ennis DB
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1552-64. PubMed ID: 24347040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Bayesian model for highly accelerated phase-contrast MRI.
Rich A; Potter LC; Jin N; Ash J; Simonetti OP; Ahmad R
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Aug; 76(2):689-701. PubMed ID: 26444911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the coupling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity measurements with computational fluid dynamics in a U bend.
Glor FP; Westenberg JJ; Vierendeels J; Danilouchkine M; Verdonck P
Artif Organs; 2002 Jul; 26(7):622-35. PubMed ID: 12081521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.
Nilsson A; Revstedt J; Heiberg E; Ståhlberg F; Bloch KM
MAGMA; 2015 Apr; 28(2):103-18. PubMed ID: 24838252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding.
Schubert T; Bieri O; Pansini M; Stippich C; Santini F
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 24300842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A framework for computational fluid dynamic analyses of patient-specific stented coronary arteries from optical coherence tomography images.
Migliori S; Chiastra C; Bologna M; Montin E; Dubini G; Aurigemma C; Fedele R; Burzotta F; Mainardi L; Migliavacca F
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():105-116. PubMed ID: 28711588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D phase contrast MRI in models of human airways: Validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations of steady inspiratory flow.
Collier GJ; Kim M; Chung Y; Wild JM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1400-1409. PubMed ID: 29630757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
