These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27044175)

  • 1. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/3 Case of Annen v. Germany, 26 November 2015, no. 3690/10 (Fifth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2016 Mar; 23(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 27044175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2011/9 Case of Hoffer and Annen v. Germany, 13 January 2011, nos. 397/07 and 2322/07 (Fifth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2011 Mar; 18(2):235-7. PubMed ID: 21644442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2011/7 Case of A, B and C v. Ireland, 16 December 2010, no. 25579/05 (Grand Chamber).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2011 Mar; 18(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 21644440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2014/5 Case of Glien v. Germany, 28 November 2013, no. 7345/12 (fifth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2014 Apr; 21(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 24851654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MEDICAL AND LEGAL ISSUES OF THE DECISIONS RENDERED BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
    Chakhvadze B; Chakhvadze G
    Georgian Med News; 2017 Jan; (262):77-81. PubMed ID: 28252433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2014/2 Case of H.W v. Germany, 19 September 2013, no. 17167/11 (Fifth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2014 Mar; 21(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 24665675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/10 Case of Blühdorn v. Germany, 18 February 2016, no. 62054/12 (Fifth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2016 Apr; 23(2):209-11. PubMed ID: 27228691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/12 Case of Klinkenbuss v. Germany, 25 February 2016, no. 53157/11 (Fifth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2016 Apr; 23(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 27228693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/5 Case of Bergmann v. Germany, 7 January 2016, no. 2327914 (Fifth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2016 Apr; 23(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 27228686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The women of Roe v. Wade.
    Glendon MA
    Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2009/3 case of Gulub Atanasov v. Bulgaria, 6 November 2008, no. 73281/01 (fifth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2009 Mar; 16(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 19353916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.
    Mulder J
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 21161853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A supportive yet critical response to "Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition".
    Liebegott K
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):61-3. PubMed ID: 21161851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2003/8. Case of Van Kück v. Germany, 12 June 2003, no. 35968/97 (Third Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2003 Dec; 10(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 15212081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2003/3 case of Stambuk v. Germany, 17 October 2002, no. 37928/97 (third section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2003 Sep; 10(3):318-20. PubMed ID: 14733049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What human life amendments mean and don't mean.
    Murphy TF
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):47-8. PubMed ID: 21161842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A, B, and C leads to D (for delegation!). A, B and C v. Ireland 25579/05 [2010] ECHR 2032.
    McGuinness S
    Med Law Rev; 2011; 19(3):476-91. PubMed ID: 21849568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The unacknowledged consensus on abortion.
    Watson K
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):57-9. PubMed ID: 21161849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/8 Case of Karpylenko v. Ukraine, 11 February 2016, no. 15509/12 (Fifth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2016 Apr; 23(2):203-6. PubMed ID: 27228689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2014/8 Case of Valeriy Fuklev v. Ukraine, 16 January 2014, no. 6318/03 (Fifth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2014 Jun; 21(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 25065035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.