532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27044217)
1. [IN VIVO THREE-DIMENSIONAL TRANSIENT MOTION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE IN HEALTHY ADULTS].
Li H; Xia Q; Bai J; Miao J; Liu J; Wei D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1494-9. PubMed ID: 27044217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine during seated axial rotation and lateral bending via a fluoroscopy-to-CT registration approach.
Lin CC; Lu TW; Wang TM; Hsu CY; Hsu SJ; Shih TF
J Biomech; 2014 Oct; 47(13):3310-7. PubMed ID: 25218506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Vertebral three-dimensional motion characteristics of adjacent segments in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis
Xu H; Liu J; Li H; Wei D; Miao J; Xia Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 32(12):1560-1566. PubMed ID: 30569684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Vertebral in vivo motion of adjacent segments in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis].
Xu H; Xia Q; Miao J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 94(47):3731-4. PubMed ID: 25623095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional intervertebral kinematics in the healthy young adult cervical spine during dynamic functional loading.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1286-93. PubMed ID: 25814180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intervertebral range of motion characteristics of normal cervical spinal segments (C0-T1) during in vivo neck motions.
Zhou C; Wang H; Wang C; Tsai TY; Yu Y; Ostergaard P; Li G; Cha T
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109418. PubMed ID: 31653508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Application of digital orthopedic technology for observing degenerative lumbar segmental instability of three-dimensional kinematic characteristics in vivo].
Wang B; Xia Q; Miao J; Xu H; Yu H; Wang S; Li G
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 94(29):2264-8. PubMed ID: 25391868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical motion segment contributions to head motion during flexion\extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2538-43. PubMed ID: 26334229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Fujii R; Nakajima Y; Tamura S; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2826-31. PubMed ID: 15599286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional motion pattern of the canine cervical spine segment C4-C5.
Hofstetter M; Gédet P; Doherr M; Ferguson SJ; Forterre F
Vet Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 19152617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [In vivo measurement of three-dimensional motion of the upper cervical spine using CT three-dimensional reconstruction].
Zhai X; Kang J; Chen X; Dong J; Qiu XW; Ding XA; Liu J; He XJ
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Jul; 32(7):658-665. PubMed ID: 31382726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Locating the Instant Center of Rotation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine with Biplanar Fluoroscopy during
Kim SH; Ham DW; Lee JI; Park SW; Ko MJ; Koo SB; Song KS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Dec; 11(4):482-489. PubMed ID: 31788173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dimensional changes of the neuroforamina in subaxial cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Mao H; Driscoll SJ; Li JS; Li G; Wood KB; Cha TD
Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):540-6. PubMed ID: 26681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities.
Li G; Wang S; Passias P; Xia Q; Li G; Wood K
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1013-21. PubMed ID: 19301040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal active head rotation.
Kang J; Chen G; Zhai X; He X
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215357. PubMed ID: 30990826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
