BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27044448)

  • 1. The Survival Rate and Surgical Morbidity of Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Li X; Li J; Wen H; Ju X; Chen X; Xia L; Ke G; Tang J; Wu X
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2953-8. PubMed ID: 27044448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Radical Abdominal Trachelectomy Versus Hysterectomy for Stage IA2-IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Guo J; Zhang Y; Chen X; Sun L; Chen K; Sheng X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):484-491. PubMed ID: 29908338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical and pathological outcomes of abdominal radical trachelectomy versus hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Zhang D; Li J; Ge H; Ju X; Chen X; Tang J; Wu X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1312-8. PubMed ID: 24987922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma.
    Diaz JP; Sonoda Y; Leitao MM; Zivanovic O; Brown CL; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18755500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
    Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
    Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with tumor diameter of 3 cm or greater.
    Kong TW; Chang SJ; Lee J; Paek J; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Feb; 24(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 24407571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
    Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vaginal radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer.
    Roy M; Plante M; Renaud MC; Têtu B
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 8812529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oncological results and recurrent risk factors following abdominal radical trachelectomy: an updated series of 333 patients.
    Li X; Li J; Jiang Z; Xia L; Ju X; Chen X; Wu X
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1169-1174. PubMed ID: 30663205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
    Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short- and long term outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
    Prodromidou A; Iavazzo C; Fotiou A; Psomiadou V; Douligeris A; Vorgias G; Kalinoglou N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jul; 300(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 31062151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: A population-based study of long-term survival.
    Tseng JH; Aloisi A; Sonoda Y; Gardner GJ; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 150(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 29776598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of abdominal radical trachelectomy to treat cervical cancer greater than 2 cm in diameter.
    Lintner B; Saso S; Tarnai L; Novak Z; Palfalvi L; Del Priore G; Smith JR; Ungar L
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1065-70. PubMed ID: 23722476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.