BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27044552)

  • 1. Enzymes Enhance Biofilm Removal Efficiency of Cleaners.
    Stiefel P; Mauerhofer S; Schneider J; Maniura-Weber K; Rosenberg U; Ren Q
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2016 Jun; 60(6):3647-52. PubMed ID: 27044552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of multiple cycles of contamination, detergent washing, and disinfection on the development of biofilm in endoscope tubing.
    Vickery K; Ngo QD; Zou J; Cossart YE
    Am J Infect Control; 2009 Aug; 37(6):470-5. PubMed ID: 19155094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in in-vitro biofilms to high-level peracetic acid disinfection.
    Akinbobola AB; Sherry L; Mckay WG; Ramage G; Williams C
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Oct; 97(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28648453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the ability of different detergents and disinfectants to remove and kill organisms in traditional biofilm.
    da Costa Luciano C; Olson N; Tipple AF; Alfa M
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 Nov; 44(11):e243-e249. PubMed ID: 27234012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new buildup biofilm model that mimics accumulation of material in flexible endoscope channels.
    da Costa Luciano C; Olson N; DeGagne P; Franca R; Tipple AFV; Alfa M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():224-229. PubMed ID: 27345713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: evaluation of detergent efficiency.
    Vickery K; Pajkos A; Cossart Y
    Am J Infect Control; 2004 May; 32(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15153929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 'Secondary biofilms' could cause failure of peracetic acid high-level disinfection of endoscopes.
    Akinbobola AB; Amaeze NJ; Mackay WG; Ramage G; Williams C
    J Hosp Infect; 2021 Jan; 107():67-75. PubMed ID: 33098959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test models to determine cleaning efficacy with different types of bioburden and its clinical correlation.
    Bloss R; Kampf G
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56 Suppl 2():S44-8. PubMed ID: 15110122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new hydrogen peroxide--based medical-device detergent with germicidal properties: comparison with enzymatic cleaners.
    Alfa MJ; Jackson M
    Am J Infect Control; 2001 Jun; 29(3):168-77. PubMed ID: 11391279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of current disinfection procedures against biofilm on contaminated GI endoscopes.
    Neves MS; da Silva MG; Ventura GM; Côrtes PB; Duarte RS; de Souza HS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 May; 83(5):944-53. PubMed ID: 26408426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mimicking disinfection and drying of biofilms in contaminated endoscopes.
    Kovaleva J; Degener JE; van der Mei HC
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Dec; 76(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 20951470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disinfection of rigid nasal endoscopes following in vitro contamination with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae.
    Bradford BD; Seiberling KA; Park FE; Hiebert JC; Chang DF
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 139(6):574-8. PubMed ID: 23680971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) channel model of cyclic-buildup biofilm and traditional biofilm: The impact of friction, and detergent on cleaning and subsequent high-level disinfection.
    Ribeiro MM; Graziano KU; Olson N; França R; Alfa MJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):172-180. PubMed ID: 31685050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biofilm removal by medical device cleaners: comparison of two bioreactor detection assays.
    Hadi R; Vickery K; Deva A; Charlton T
    J Hosp Infect; 2010 Feb; 74(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 20092911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using an efficient biofilm detaching agent: an essential step for the improvement of endoscope reprocessing protocols.
    Marion K; Freney J; James G; Bergeron E; Renaud FN; Costerton JW
    J Hosp Infect; 2006 Oct; 64(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16919846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of various cleaning regimens and current guidelines in contact lens case biofilm removal.
    Wu YT; Zhu H; Willcox M; Stapleton F
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5287-92. PubMed ID: 21474766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact lens storage case hygiene practice and storage case contamination.
    Vijay AK; Willcox M; Zhu H; Stapleton F
    Eye Contact Lens; 2015 Mar; 41(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 25230082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling microbial survival in buildup biofilm for complex medical devices.
    Alfa MJ; Howie R
    BMC Infect Dis; 2009 May; 9():56. PubMed ID: 19426471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of disinfecting solutions in removing biofilms from polyvinyl chloride tracheostomy tubes.
    Silva RC; Carver RA; Ojano-Dirain CP; Antonelli PJ
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Jan; 123(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 22887035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of enzymatic cleaning agents and disinfectants against bacterial biofilms.
    Augustin M; Ali-Vehmas T; Atroshi F
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2004 Feb; 7(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15144735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.