These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27044803)

  • 1. The face-responsive M170 is modulated by sensor selection: An example of circularity in the analysis of MEG-data.
    Tiedt HO; Lueschow A; Pauls A; Weber JE
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():137-40. PubMed ID: 27044803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face-sensitive brain responses measured from a four-year-old child with a custom-sized child MEG system.
    He W; Brock J; Johnson BW
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():213-7. PubMed ID: 24295557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics.
    Harris AM; Duchaine BC; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2125-36. PubMed ID: 16243056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Face-selective responses in combined EEG/MEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).
    Hauk O; Rice GE; Volfart A; Magnabosco F; Ralph MAL; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118460. PubMed ID: 34363957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 170ms Response to Faces as Measured by MEG (M170) Is Consistently Altered in Congenital Prosopagnosia.
    Lueschow A; Weber JE; Carbon CC; Deffke I; Sander T; Grüter T; Grüter M; Trahms L; Curio G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137624. PubMed ID: 26393348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention.
    Furey ML; Tanskanen T; Beauchamp MS; Avikainen S; Uutela K; Hari R; Haxby JV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jan; 103(4):1065-70. PubMed ID: 16415158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brain response during the M170 time interval is sensitive to socially relevant information.
    Arviv O; Goldstein A; Weeting JC; Becker ES; Lange WG; Gilboa-Schechtman E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Nov; 78():18-28. PubMed ID: 26423664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Face processing in the brains of pre-school aged children measured with MEG.
    He W; Brock J; Johnson BW
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():317-27. PubMed ID: 25463467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A magnetoencephalographic study of face processing: M170, gamma-band oscillations and source localization.
    Gao Z; Goldstein A; Harpaz Y; Hansel M; Zion-Golumbic E; Bentin S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1783-95. PubMed ID: 22422432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise.
    Xu Y; Liu J; Kanwisher N
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):588-97. PubMed ID: 15716149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data-point-wise spatiotemporal mapping of human ventral visual areas: Use of spatial frequency/luminance-modulated chromatic faces.
    Takeda A; Yamada E; Uehara T; Ogata K; Okamoto T; Tobimatsu S
    Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 239():118325. PubMed ID: 34216773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG.
    Itier RJ; Herdman AT; George N; Cheyne D; Taylor MJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1115(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 16930564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MEG Adaptation Resolves the Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Face-Sensitive Brain Responses.
    Simpson MI; Johnson SR; Prendergast G; Kokkinakis AV; Johnson E; Green GG; Johnston PJ
    J Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 35(45):15088-96. PubMed ID: 26558780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A kiss is not a kiss: visually evoked neuromagnetic fields reveal differential sensitivities to brief presentations of kissing couples.
    Cogan GB; Kirshenbaum SR; Walker J; Poeppel D
    Neuroreport; 2015 Sep; 26(14):850-5. PubMed ID: 26287497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus.
    Deffke I; Sander T; Heidenreich J; Sommer W; Curio G; Trahms L; Lueschow A
    Neuroimage; 2007 May; 35(4):1495-501. PubMed ID: 17363282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain responses to repetitions of human and animal faces, inverted faces, and objects: an MEG study.
    Schweinberger SR; Kaufmann JM; Moratti S; Keil A; Burton AM
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1184():226-33. PubMed ID: 17976538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source-reconstruction of event-related fields reveals hyperfunction and hypofunction of cortical circuits in antipsychotic-naive, first-episode schizophrenia patients during Mooney face processing.
    Rivolta D; Castellanos NP; Stawowsky C; Helbling S; Wibral M; Grützner C; Koethe D; Birkner K; Kranaster L; Enning F; Singer W; Leweke FM; Uhlhaas PJ
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(17):5909-17. PubMed ID: 24760850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurophysiological Face Processing Deficits in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia: An MEG Study.
    Ohara N; Hirano Y; Oribe N; Tamura S; Nakamura I; Hirano S; Tsuchimoto R; Ueno T; Togao O; Hiwatashi A; Nakao T; Onitsuka T
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():554844. PubMed ID: 33101080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex-differences of face coding: evidence from larger right hemispheric M170 in men and dipole source modelling.
    Tiedt HO; Weber JE; Pauls A; Beier KM; Lueschow A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69107. PubMed ID: 23874881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.