293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2704501)
1. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears after earlier smears with atypical squamous cells.
Ridgley R; Hernandez E; Cruz C; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):285-8. PubMed ID: 3361519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
Andrews S; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):751-3. PubMed ID: 2704502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aggressive evaluation for atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Lindheim SR; Smith-Nguyen G
J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):971-3. PubMed ID: 2246766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy.
Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?
Sherman ME; Kelly D
Mod Pathol; 1992 May; 5(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 1495939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Squamous atypia on cytology. The influence of age.
Kaminski PF; Stevens CW; Wheelock JB
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):617-20. PubMed ID: 2553961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
Slawson DC; Bennett JH; Herman JM
J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
Kohan S; Noumoff J; Beckman EM; Morris M; Weiner E; Douglas GW
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 4009560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
Townsend DE; Ostergard DR; Mishell DR; Hirose FM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?
Kivlahan C; Ingram E
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
